Are Back & Front Focal Lengths Equal for Thick Lenses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zak8000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lens
zak8000
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


is the back focal length equal to the front focal length of a thick lens ie a thick plano convex lens?

i know it is not but do not know how to clarify it please help

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
A planoconvex lens is shaped like a capital D. One side has 0 power, and the other side has a power (because it has a curvature). Assume the lens has a thickness of d and a refractive index of n.

The BVP is given by (F1+F2-(d/n)F1F2)(1-(d/n)F1)
The FVP is given by (F1+F2-(d/n)F1F2)(1-(d/n)F2)

Subbing in F1 = 0, F2 = F2, we can clearly see that BVP is not the same as FVP (unless d is 0 but we disregard this, because the lens has a definite thickness).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top