Are Exothermic Reactions a Violation of the Law of Conservation of Mass?

AI Thread Summary
Exothermic reactions do not violate the law of conservation of mass, as this principle is more of a guideline than an absolute law. In chemical reactions, the energy changes are minimal compared to the mass of the reactants, making mass conservation appear valid. The concept of mass-energy equivalence is more pronounced in nuclear reactions, where significant mass deficits can be observed. Ultimately, it is the total energy that remains conserved in all reactions, including exothermic ones.
Nikhil faraday
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Are exothermic reactions violation of law of conservation of mass , because energy and mass are equivalent? Please clarify!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Conservation of mass is a rule of thumb, not a fundamental law. It works because the energy gain or loss in chemical reactions is very small compared with the total mass of the reactants. The mass deficit gets obvious in nuclear reactions. It is total energy that gets conserved.

[edit]Note: the mass-energy gain or loss in chemical reactions is very small (order parts per billion) compared with the electro-magnetic energy energy change from just rearranging the atoms.
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
Conservation of mass is a rule of thumb, not a fundamental law. It works because the energy gain or loss in chemical reactions is very small compared with the total mass of the reactants. The mass deficit gets obvious in nuclear reactions. It is total energy that gets conserved.
Thanks
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top