Are half of all natural numbers even?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether half of all natural numbers are even. Participants explore concepts related to set theory, density, and the implications of dealing with infinite sets.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the question is poorly worded, questioning how one can divide an infinite set by half.
  • Others propose that there is a bijection between natural numbers and even numbers, implying that there are as many even numbers as natural numbers.
  • Several participants introduce the concept of density, noting that the asymptotic density of even numbers is 1/2, while the Schnirelmann density is 0.
  • It is mentioned that the Schnirelmann density of odd numbers is 1/2, leading to a discussion about the peculiarities of these densities.
  • One participant elaborates on the Schnirelmann density, explaining its relation to sumsets and how the absence of certain numbers affects density calculations.
  • A later reply references a paradox by David Hilbert to illustrate the complexities of arithmetic with infinity, relating it to the original question.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of "half" in the context of infinite sets. While some agree on the existence of a bijection and the concept of density, others highlight the complexities and nuances involved, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the ambiguity of terms like "half" when applied to infinite sets, and the dependence on specific definitions of density. The discussion also touches on the implications of set theory versus number theory.

textbooks
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
It might be a silly question but I was just wondering if this was unprovable or false...

Thanks guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a poorly worded question. How many natural numbers are there, and how do you divide that by half?

As a start up to this kind of stuff, consider the function

f(n) = 2n

You now have a bijection, or a 1-1 and onto function, from the set of natural numbers to the set of even numbers. So for every even number you give me, I can give you a natural number, and for every natural number, I can give you an even number. Hence there must be the same number of even numbers as there are natural numbers.

This is more related to set theory than number theory (counting the size of different sets)
 
There are some concepts of "density" of a set of natural numbers. The set of even numbers has density 1/2.
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/AsymptoticDensity.html"
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SchnirelmannDensity.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's not silly but it depends on exactly what you mean by "half" of an infinite set. As g. edgar points out, there are several ways of defining that.
 
g_edgar said:
There are some concepts of "density" of a set of natural numbers. The set of even numbers has density 1/2.
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/AsymptoticDensity.html"
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SchnirelmannDensity.html"

The asymptotic density of the even numbers is indeed 1/2. But the Schnirelmann density is 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
CRGreathouse said:
The asymptotic density of the even numbers is indeed 1/2. But the Schnirelmann density is 0.

...and the Schnirelmann density of the odd numbers is 1/2
 
g_edgar said:
...and the Schnirelmann density of the odd numbers is 1/2

Right.
 
So the Schnirelmann density of the even numbers is 0 and the Schnirelmann density of the odd numbers is 1/2? Peculiar!
 
HallsofIvy said:
So the Schnirelmann density of the even numbers is 0 and the Schnirelmann density of the odd numbers is 1/2? Peculiar!

The Schnirelmann density relates to sumsets, and sets missing enough small numbers won't be able to sumset to given values even if iterated many times. In particular if the set lacks 1, it won't be able to sum to 1. Since the even don't have one, their density is 0.
 
  • #10
Office_Shredder said:
It's a poorly worded question. How many natural numbers are there, and how do you divide that by half?

As a start up to this kind of stuff, consider the function

f(n) = 2n

You now have a bijection, or a 1-1 and onto function, from the set of natural numbers to the set of even numbers. So for every even number you give me, I can give you a natural number, and for every natural number, I can give you an even number. Hence there must be the same number of even numbers as there are natural numbers.

This is more related to set theory than number theory (counting the size of different sets)

thats basically the answer right there.

Questions like these are very tricky because you're operating with infinity. How Shredder said, the size of the set of even numbers is the same as the size of the set of natural numbers.

A famous paradox by David Hilbert shows why doing arithmetic with infinity is so tricky, and the last part about the odd rooms of his Grand Hotel shares some similarities with the quetsion on this thread.

Wikipedia said:
Consider a hypothetical hotel with infinitely many rooms, all of which are occupied – that is to say every room contains a guest. Suppose a new guest arrives and wishes to be accommodated in the hotel. If the hotel had only finitely many rooms, then it can be clearly seen that the request could not be fulfilled, but because the hotel has infinitely many rooms then if you move the guest occupying room 1 to room 2, the guest occupying room 2 to room 3 and so on, you can fit the newcomer into room 1. By extension it is possible to make room for a countably infinite number of new clients: just move the person occupying room 1 to room 2, the guest occupying room 2 to room 4, and in general room N to room 2*N, and all the odd-numbered rooms will be free for the new guests.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K