Are Hot Jupiters in Stable Orbital Resonance?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether hot Jupiters can maintain stable orbits through resonance. It explores the implications of adding a hot Jupiter to our solar system, suggesting that the absence of cold gas giants in certain systems may indicate a history of ejection or destruction. While resonance is not necessary for stability, many multi-planet systems exhibit resonances, though hot Jupiters with eccentric orbits likely do not. The conversation also touches on the potential effects of stellar phenomena on hot Jupiters, including atmospheric erosion from solar winds. Overall, the migration theory supports the idea that hot Jupiters could exist in systems lacking cold gas giants.
cph
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Would it seem reasonable that so-called ‘hot jupiters’ are in resonance i.e. have a stable orbit? If one utilized our stellar system as a simulation, with the addition of a hot jupiter, then what would the resonance be? Would it be calculated as non integral? Then if our cold gas giant were discarded, would this then seem to change the resonance; hence the possibility of a stable orbit? Thus might the data set of hot jupiters of approximately 70-100, all have systems with no cold gas giants? Would this then also be consistent with a 3-body scenario, with ejection of a cold gas giant and inward migration of what becomes a hot Jupiter in stable orbit? Hence would one have the prediction of no cold gas giants for any of the hot Jupiter systems?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
cph said:
Would it seem reasonable that so-called ‘hot jupiters’ are in resonance i.e. have a stable orbit?
Resonance is not required for a stable orbit. A large number (and fraction) of multi-planet extrasolar systems are known to be in resonance however. It is a little more complicated with hot-jupiters, because they are so close in. In general, the hot-jupiters with eccentric orbits can be assumed to not be in significant resonances.

cph said:
If one utilized our stellar system as a simulation, with the addition of a hot jupiter, then what would the resonance be?
There would be many possible resonances... i.e. there are many semi-majoraxes at which the hot Jupiter could be in a resonance with our-own jupiter.

cph said:
Would it be calculated as non integral?
What do you mean?---Resonances are defined as (near) integral.

cph said:
Then if our cold gas giant were discarded, would this then seem to change the resonance.
Well, if there's nothing to resonate with... then yes, it would change the resonance.
It could still be in resonance with saturn (more accurately, saturn could be in resonance with it).

cph said:
Hence would one have the prediction of no cold gas giants for any of the hot Jupiter systems?
There are a tremendous number of 'if's and steps in that argument... many of which I don't quite follow.

Overall: if the migration theory is correct, it is reasonable to assume that other cold-giants might have been ejected or otherwise destroyed. It is also possible that other bodies could survive. Additionally, if some hot-jupiters managed to form in situ, in might be a good method of seeding other giants further out (via resonance perturbations).
 
Wouldn't hot jupiters be effected by million degree corona and/or stellar flares?
 
Yes, their hot, bloated atmospheres are being eroded by the solar wind. IIRC, some seem to have a sufficiently intense magnetosphere to slow this process...
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top