Are hydraulics the strongest way to move a robot's legs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheCurious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydraulics
AI Thread Summary
Hydraulics are often considered the most efficient method for moving heavy robotic legs due to their ability to handle substantial loads, but they come with high costs and maintenance challenges. Electric cylinders and actuators are viable alternatives, especially for lighter applications, though they struggle with heavy loads and speed limitations. Pneumatics can offer a solution, but they may introduce issues like bounce due to air compression. Emerging technologies, such as artificial muscles and smart fluids that change viscosity with electrical current, present innovative options for robotic movement. Ultimately, the choice of actuation method should be based on the robot's intended use, load requirements, and budget constraints.
TheCurious
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hi, in the hypothetical, if you had a robot with a large leg (like a mech), would hydraulics be the only way to move the leg like muscles do? what about electric cylinders? Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
ABB robotics makes robotic arms controlled by electric motors. Quickly scanning their website, I saw that their largest robotic arm can support about 500kg.

Exavators on constructon sites can support weights many times that and they use hydraulics.
 
As far as I know, from an efficiency and leverage standpoint it's better to use hydraulics. However in the case of a robot I would fancy using other smaller devices depending on what it is to be used for and how much load it has to lift. I don't know about moving like muscles do, but I imagine much of that can done by programming specific behaviors even if the device you use moves much too abruptly or in an inhuman fashion.
 
Would a electrical linear actuator help in your case? It uses a power screw to drive the piston.
 
To TheCurious;

Using hydraulic to run the robotic legs isn't a solution. Hydraulic need reservoir, compressor, etc... will be very costly for components and also fluid maintenance. Hydraulic robot normally used for industrial due to very heavy loads. My personal experience to run a robot definitely will be electrical. Like what you mention, "electrical cylinder". The limitation of electrical cylinder its hardly carry heavy loads.

Another consideration is the speed. You must clearly understand the speed vs torque graph. If you really want to consider hydualic, I am very sure your robot will be extremely slow.

Because of this reason, pneumatic is a best solution. For me, I will determine the weight of the robot without load (stability) and with load handling and pre-determine whether run by electrical or pneumatic. Calculation must be carry out from its mechanism to respect to the motor and to another parts such as the stress & strain calculation of the cylinders.
 
Last edited:
boston dynamics (developers of big dog etc www.bostondynamics.com) use hydraluic actuators in their larger designs.
 
I'm always a bit leery about pneumatics for heavy applications because of the 'bounce' factor resultant of the air being able to be compressed within the cylinder. You don't have that problem with hydraulics because of the fluid being essentially incompressible. There are some very fast-acting systems available, including proportional solenoid valves.
If this is strictly theoretical, or on an unlimited budget, you can also investigate artificial muscles that are in development. So far, they're fairly small and very expensive, but the potential looks very good.
 
This is just a suggestion, but I know that modern robotics often uses a liquid which changes it viscosity when a current passes through it (can't remember the name for that fluid) to act as muscles for the robots, I think that would be the ideal option in this case as this is a liquid, so it is incompressible, and there is a relationship between its viscosity to the current applied to it for accurate movements. And all you need is the liquid and a battery and a regulator to make it work. Hope this helps.
 
Back
Top