Are Men Truly Happier Than Women Due to Societal and Biological Differences?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Women
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the humorous and often exaggerated differences between men and women, highlighting perceived advantages that men have, which are suggested to contribute to their happiness. Points include the simplicity of men's lives, such as less concern over appearance, straightforward social interactions, and fewer emotional complexities. The conversation also touches on the societal expectations and pressures faced by women, contrasting them with the carefree nature attributed to men. Participants share jokes and anecdotes, emphasizing the comedic aspects of gender stereotypes while also expressing frustrations regarding gender dynamics, particularly in dating and social settings. The tone is light-hearted, with a mix of banter and serious commentary on the challenges both genders face.
  • #101
cronxeh said:
hmm so I am not the only one who has a laptop in bed with me..
I also have a laptop in bed with me. It doesn't snore, doesn't care what the temperature is (I like it cool), it doesn't hog the covers and my sneezing and nose blowing doesn't keep it awake at night. :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
Evo said:
...and my sneezing and nose blowing doesn't keep it awake at night. :biggrin:
Cocaine's a tough road, Evo.
 
  • #103
zoobyshoe said:
Anyway, Huck, I know exactly what you mean about the fat pants, and that sort of thing. It has taken me considerable time to figure out what is probably behind this, and it isn't really vanity. Women's concern about their appearance is, I think, a kind of natural necessity with evolutionary underpinnings.
I see it more as a circle. Evolution forms society and society then forms evolution. I also consider the option that vanity is a natural necessity. All of the virtues that we associate with negative aspects (or vices as some may call them) are an important part of human evolution. Without a cause of struggle there is no necessity for change and thus no evolution. So I still see vanity as the cause of tension in the 'fat pants' question. I'm open to alternatives but expect that it will take years before I change my opinion because it took years to form.

Don't know if you've read the Mars/Venus book, but I found it to be very insightful. It explained a lot of things to me about women that I would never have figured out on my own.
Another one to put on my must read list. I really should get back to trying to finish that.

I never meant to suggest you feign interest. What I meant to point out is that listening is the best way to effectively communicate interest.
I think most guys know this, which is why many feign interest in conversations that do not interest them. Even if I was interested in the woman I would at first try to be patient. If she is yaking my ear off without regards to my interests then I would attempt to change the subject, or suggest another activity. Then I might feign interest in the conversation, but I'd quickly become impatient. Soon I would just tell her straight out that I'd rather do something else than continue to talk about this subject.

Hmm, maybe if I find myself not interested in much of what a woman has to say then I am interested in that woman for the wrong reasons. I'm not much of a talker anyway. (but I can write all day)
 
  • #104
Huckleberry said:
I see it more as a circle. Evolution forms society and society then forms evolution.
The evolutionary bottom line is that if a man isn't sexually exited no sex act is going to take place. (No genes will be transferred to the next generation.) Women know this and are always trying to figure out what men like. I translate the question about pants to mean "Do you still find me attractive?"

I met a woman here, couple three months ago, and she said something to the effect that, as soon as a woman loses her virginity she is in competition with all other women for men. That being the case women never believe anything any other woman tells them about how they look. They're always trying to figure out non-obvious ways to find out what men think. The pants quetion should be translated as fishing for reassurance, rather than vanity.
If she is yaking my ear off without regards to my interests then I would attempt to change the subject, or suggest another activity.
Women yak non-stop mostly to vent. Guys sometimes do it in the mistaken belief it is like pouring more and more mojo into her, hypnotizing her. It usually ends up driving her away.
Hmm, maybe if I find myself not interested in much of what a woman has to say then I am interested in that woman for the wrong reasons.
Yeah, if every conversation ends up with her venting and you listening, it's pointless to stick around.
 
  • #105
zoobyshoe said:
The evolutionary bottom line is that if a man isn't sexually exited no sex act is going to take place. (No genes will be transferred to the next generation.) Women know this and are always trying to figure out what men like. I translate the question about pants to mean "Do you still find me attractive?"
I've never been satisfied with the concept that evolution encapsulates my individuality. Physically attractive women are more likely to attract a man. What qualifies as attractive varies from one person to another. (already a thread on this one elsewhere) For me, this is initially important, but the more I come to know a woman the less important it becomes. The transition can happen in seconds. Physical attraction doesn't hold any influence on maintaining a relationship for me. And I find that the more I come to know a woman the more attractive she becomes. And if I can't find an emotional connection with an attractive woman she becomes much less desirable to me.

I see a huge difference between the phrases "Does my butt look fat in these pants?" and "Do you still find me attractive?" The first one causes me tension and harm either way I answer it. Even if her butt does not appear fat to me and I can answer the question positively and honestly I still feel like I have been used to prop up her self-esteem and the question has nothing to do with how I feel about her. The second one I can answer honestly and with pleasure because it is an honest question. The first question is actually asking how attractive she appears to the rest of the world. The second one is asking exactly what it states.

Women yak non-stop mostly to vent. Guys sometimes do it in the mistaken belief it is like pouring more and more mojo into her, hypnotizing her. It usually ends up driving her away.
Venting is okay with me. Not every day of course, but I've always got a sympathetic ear for venting. She might be yaking about how she folds her laundry or the types of birds that visit her backyard, but if I recognize that venting is the purpose then that is interesting to me.

There are times where talking about the weather is just fine. Sometimes when I'm around someone who's company I enjoy (male or female) it's nice to just enjoy their company and it doesn't matter what is said. With a woman there sometimes feels like there is a need to make conversation, but nothing comes to mind at the moment. I can recognize that too and some talk about shoe inserts is just fine. I usually look for the motivation behind the words and not so much at the words themselves.

edit- Another, more likely option just occurred to me. A woman's attractiveness is not only important for attracting men. The way women are viewed in society her attractiveness affects the way people perceive her, even other women. When she asks her male companion "Do I look fat in these pants?" she may very well be asking how she appears to the rest of the world. She is asking someone she loves and trusts what other people think of her. I still think its a loaded question and I would much rather answer the honest question, but I can understand that she might feel embarrassed. Doesn't seem 100% trustful to ask such a question, but people can die of embarrassment, so I guess it is understandable.
 
Last edited:
  • #106
Huckleberry said:
I've never been satisfied with the concept that evolution encapsulates my individuality.
No progeny for you!
Physically attractive women are more likely to attract a man...
... And if I can't find an emotional connection with an attractive woman she becomes much less desirable to me.
You're talking about relationships. All the genes need to be passed on is...obvious.
I see a huge difference between the phrases "Does my butt look fat in these pants?" and "Do you still find me attractive?"
There would be if you asked the quetion, but women have different thought processes. This is further explained in Mars/Venus.
The way women are viewed in society her attractiveness affects the way people perceive her, even other women. When she asks her male companion "Do I look fat in these pants?" she may very well be asking how she appears to the rest of the world. She is asking someone she loves and trusts what other people think of her.
Yup. Feeling skittish about going out into public. Needs
reassurance. You are absolutely right about there being no right answer in this case, because it is impossible for you to give any guarrantees about how anyone else will view her. That being the case, you feel it's unfair of her to ask, as if you could possibly know what everyone else will think.
 
  • #107
This fat butt thing is winding me up a bit. There's absolutely no way in hell I'd ever ask anyone that, it would make me feel weak and ashamed. I feel that it's wrong for people to judge others by their appearence and hence that it's also wrong to expect other people to judge you by your appearence. And if you actually have a fat butt, then that's your butt and you should learn to live with it. I hate the way it's expected of women to make themselves look prettier than they really are, with make-up and fake tans and hair bleach and butt-diminishing trousers and all the rest.
 
  • #108
icvotria said:
This fat butt thing is winding me up a bit. There's absolutely no way in hell I'd ever ask anyone that, it would make me feel weak and ashamed. I feel that it's wrong for people to judge others by their appearence and hence that it's also wrong to expect other people to judge you by your appearence. And if you actually have a fat butt, then that's your butt and you should learn to live with it. I hate the way it's expected of women to make themselves look prettier than they really are, with make-up and fake tans and hair bleach and butt-diminishing trousers and all the rest.
Yay icvotria. I've always been cylinder shaped - no butt, no hips, no waist. My waist measurement is almost the same size as my hip measurement (never had hips or a butt), so I have never had that "hourglass" shape. :frown: My first husband once asked me how I kept my pants from falling off. :cry:
 
  • #109
zoobyshoe said:
Huckleberry said:
I've never been satisfied with the concept that evolution encapsulates my individuality.
No progeny for you!
This certainly seems to be the trend I'm setting for myself lately, but I think it's more of a matter of getting my life straightened out and finding the right woman. I'm interested in how you draw this conclusion.
zoobyshoe said:
Huckleberry said:
Physically attractive women are more likely to attract a man...
... And if I can't find an emotional connection with an attractive woman she becomes much less desirable to me.
You're talking about relationships. All the genes need to be passed on is...obvious.
Obviously all that is required to reproduce is sex between a man and woman. I think a relationship is a pretty important part of having a child. There are attractive women that I wouldn't even look twice at because I just don't like them. The thought of having a child with the Trim Spa woman is repulsive to me.
zoobyshoe said:
Huckleberry said:
I see a huge difference between the phrases "Does my butt look fat in these pants?" and "Do you still find me attractive?"
There would be if you asked the quetion, but women have different thought processes. This is further explained in Mars/Venus.
What are the thought processes of a woman on this matter? There's got to be some around here that would help answer this quetion.

edit- Is there a change in the roles of the sexes currently underway? Hmm, maybe a topic for a new thread?
 
Last edited:
  • #110
Evo said:
Yay icvotria. I've always been cylinder shaped - no butt, no hips, no waist. My waist measurement is almost the same size as my hip measurement (never had hips or a butt), so I have never had that "hourglass" shape. :frown: My first husband once asked me how I kept my pants from falling off. :cry:

Does that mean you can fit those pants they sell in most stores? I keep wondering who fits them since they seem to have the waist and hips cut about the same size, when most women have thinner waists than hips. I expect to have less of a difference between waist and hip sizes in the junior or misses depts, but in women's clothing, surely someone could figure out that the waist should be tapered. :rolleyes:

Anyway, I agree with you and icvotria, I'd never ask anyone if my butt looked fat in anything! The only time I put a guy on the spot about clothing was when he was the only one around to ask and I realized the blouse I had brought along to wear out was more sheer than I expected and I didn't have a camisole, so I asked if it was really obvious you could see my bra through the blouse (I honestly couldn't tell if it was visible or not). He answered something like, "no worse than anyone else walking around NY." No help at all. I took that answer to mean yes, but he wasn't going to complain about it, so I told him if I got too many stares, I was going to steal his jacket, and we headed out to dinner. It would have been quite a hassle to find another appropriate outfit.
 
  • #111
Moonbear said:
Does that mean you can fit those pants they sell in most stores? I keep wondering who fits them since they seem to have the waist and hips cut about the same size, when most women have thinner waists than hips. I expect to have less of a difference between waist and hip sizes in the junior or misses depts, but in women's clothing, surely someone could figure out that the waist should be tapered. :rolleyes:
No, if I buy a pair of pants to fit my waist, the hips and legs are so big, they look like clown pants. Then I'm at that odd height at the max range for petite and minimum for average (5'3"-5'4"), but very long legs and shortwaisted. So, the waist comes up under my armpits and the pant legs look like I'm ready to wade through high water. Liz Claiborne is the only line of clothing I've found that doesn't make me look like a freak. :redface:
 
  • #112
hmmm... well, I'm glad you guys are so confident and secure about your bodies. i don't know if i do the pants thing... but I'm sure i say things similar... usually i probably make definitive statements though, like "i look gross in this shirt," or something... its definately an insecurity thing. I'm seeing this guy now, and he insists that i have a great body... i just never believe him though. i think he's just trying to be nice. if he says something like, "you look nice today," he usually gets annoyed at me cause i don't believe him, and i question him, and i get all stupid. usually i either act totally insecure, or i fake that I'm really hot.
 
  • #113
Evo said:
No, if I buy a pair of pants to fit my waist, the hips and legs are so big, they look like clown pants. Then I'm at that odd height at the max range for petite and minimum for average (5'3"-5'4"), but very long legs and shortwaisted. So, the waist comes up under my armpits and the pant legs look like I'm ready to wade through high water. Liz Claiborne is the only line of clothing I've found that doesn't make me look like a freak. :redface:

Well, then I'm still boggled over just who fits those pants. I'd really like to see what shape the woman is that those are cut for!

I'm not much better off with the length either. Even petite pants can be too long for me, or other times they are too short. I always have to hem pants. I try to avoid ones that come with cuffs because I always screw those up when hemming (or like one pair, they get redesigned to not have cuffs when I mismeasure). I think I need a good seamstress to custom tailor my clothes.
 
  • #114
Gale17 said:
hmmm... well, I'm glad you guys are so confident and secure about your bodies. i don't know if i do the pants thing... but I'm sure i say things similar... usually i probably make definitive statements though, like "i look gross in this shirt," or something... its definately an insecurity thing. I'm seeing this guy now, and he insists that i have a great body... i just never believe him though. i think he's just trying to be nice. if he says something like, "you look nice today," he usually gets annoyed at me cause i don't believe him, and i question him, and i get all stupid. usually i either act totally insecure, or i fake that I'm really hot.

Hey, you're just you. No reason to be unhappy with it. We've seen your face, with and without the pillow :biggrin:, and you are a very pretty young lady. If a guy compliments you, the appropriate answer is, "Thank you." Everyone has some good features/traits and some bad features/traits, and the trick is to find someone who finds even the bad features attractive (or at least endearing). :approve: If you see enough people risk their lives with eating disorders or cosmetic surgery just for appearances, you realize it's a lot easier to just accept yourself the way you are.
 
  • #115
Gale17 said:
i don't know if i do the pants thing... but I'm sure i say things similar... usually i probably make definitive statements though, like "i look gross in this shirt," or something... its definately an insecurity thing.
This is what I'm trying to tell Huck. It's insecurity. There must be some evolutionary advantage to it or it would have been bred out of the human race a long time ago.
 
  • #116
zoobyshoe said:
This is what I'm trying to tell Huck. It's insecurity. There must be some evolutionary advantage to it or it would have been bred out of the human race a long time ago.

Nope, doesn't have to be any advantage, as long as it isn't a disadvantage.
 
  • #117
icvotria said:
I hate the way it's expected of women to make themselves look prettier than they really are, with make-up and fake tans and hair bleach and butt-diminishing trousers and all the rest.
This could have been said by 95% of the women I went to college with, back in the days when feminism was at its peak.

Where in hell did they all go?
 
  • #118
Moonbear said:
Nope, doesn't have to be any advantage, as long as it isn't a disadvantage.
Correction, then:

There must not be anything disadvantageous about it, otherwise it would have been bred out of the human race long ago.
 
  • #119
The pants thing is certainly in the jeans. :rolleyes:
 
  • #120
zoobyshoe said:
This is what I'm trying to tell Huck. It's insecurity. There must be some evolutionary advantage to it or it would have been bred out of the human race a long time ago.
I've been watching and taking notes. :biggrin:

edit- What explanation could there be for a genetic disposition for insecurity of appearance in women?
 
Last edited:
  • #121
Ivan Seeking said:
The pants thing is certainly in the jeans. :rolleyes:
I spent pages avoiding that pun.
 
  • #122
Huckleberry said:
I've been watching and taking notes. :biggrin:

edit- What explanation could there be for a genetic disposition for insecurity of appearance in women?

its not genetic. Society is patriarichal. historically men courted women, and chose whichever one they felt most worthy, regardless of what we thought. if we wanted a good guy, the best we could do is try to be as appealing as possible to those guys. so developed the tendency for women to try and be as goodlooking as possible. then it became a competition and blah blah, now women still have that societal pressure to conform and look "pretty" and obviously, if you feel that much pressure, you eventually become insecure if you don't think you're pretty as society says you ought be and ya..
 
  • #123
zoobyshoe said:
I spent pages avoiding that pun.

What can I say? I'm a pun whore.
 
  • #124
Originally posted by Evo
A man is driving up a steep, narrow road.
A woman is driving down the same road.
As they pass each other, the woman leans out the window and yells "PIG!"
The man immediately leans out the window and replies,"B*tch!"
They continue on their way, and as the man rounds the next corner, he crashes into a pig in the middle of the road.
This would've been more accurate if the woman crashed into the pig. Cause everyone knows that women can't drive. :-p

"todo lo que se mueva es calne y la calne es placer"
 
  • #125
Here's a female-biased sexist joke off the internet
Eve was sitting in a corner in the garden. "Lord, I have a problem."
"What's the problem, Eve?"
"I know that You created me and provided this beautiful garden and all of these wonderful animals, but I'm just not happy."
"And why is that Eve?"
"Lord, I am lonely, and I'm sick to death of apples."
"Well, Eve, in that case, I have a solution. I shall create man for you."
"Man? What is that Lord?"
"A flawed creature, with many bad traits. He'll lie, cheat, and be vain; all in all, he'll give you a hard time. But he'll be bigger, faster, and will like to hunt and kill things. I'll create him in such a way that he will satisfy your physical needs. He will be witless, and will revel in childish things like fighting and kicking a ball about. He won't be as smart as you, so he will also need your advice to think properly."
"Sounds great," says Eve, with ironically raised eyebrows, "but what's the catch Lord?"
"Well, you can have him on one condition."
"And what's that Lord?"
"As I said, he'll be proud, arrogant, and self-admiring, so you'll have to let him believe that I made him first. And it will have to be our little secret -- you know -- woman to woman."
Heeheehee
 
  • #126
icvotria said:
Here's a female-biased sexist joke off the internet Heeheehee
Where's the joke? :biggrin:
 
  • #127
Gale17 said:
its not genetic.
There may not be a specific attraction-insecurity gene but insecurity itself has to be genetic. It is a mild form of fear, and without fear we'd do all kinds of dangerous stuff over and over and die before we were 10 years old.
 
  • #128
Evo said:
Where's the joke? :biggrin:
Here it is:

Adam says to God: "You made Eve so beautiful! Why did you make her so beautiful?

"So you would love her."

"But she's very stupid. Whay did you make her so stupid?"

"So she would love you."
 
  • #129
I think insecurity can take many forms. A person may become angry, or embarrassed, or arrogant or a number of other conditions. I think the point at which the ball leaves the hand, so to speak, in the fat pants quetion is where the insecurity manifests itself in vanity.

From the posts here it seems there definitely is much concern over females appearance, likely based in insecurity. Not one woman here yet has claimed that asking such a quetion is proper. I think the reason for this is a moral/ethical issue.

Is fear genetic or learned? Emotional responses can be attributed to activity in the brain and that would be genetic. The conditions that evoke these responses appear to be learned behaviors formed from society. I think insecurity is the social manifestation of the genetic capability to experience fear.

genetics, society, ethics/ fear, insecurity, vanity.
 
Back
Top