Are my answers correct? (3D statics)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Femme_physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a 3D statics problem involving forces acting on a structure supported by various axes. The original poster seeks confirmation of their calculations regarding reactions at specific points, particularly at shaft CE and axes A and B, under a vertical force of 600 N.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants share their solution attempts and express confusion over differing methods. There is a focus on reducing the problem to 2D for clarity, with some participants questioning the correctness of each other's calculations and assumptions regarding coordinate directions.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's methods. Some have pointed out potential mistakes in calculations, while others reflect on their understanding of coordinate systems. There is no explicit consensus, but guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of axes and the application of forces.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the psychological challenges of interpreting coordinate systems, particularly the orientation of the y and z axes in 3D versus 2D views. This has led to confusion in calculations and assumptions about directionality.

Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
I don't have the solution manual answer for this problem, can anyone help please confirm my answers are correct?

Homework Statement




http://img860.imageshack.us/img860/6118/40893341.jpg [/QUOTE]

On a smooth horizontal weightless surface ABDC acts at the center a vertical force of 600 [N]. The surface is connected to the wall through axes A and B and supported by shaft CE.

A) Calculate reaction at CE
B) Calculate reactions at axes A and B. Presume the forces at the B axis are at the X and Y direction only.


The Attempt at a Solution



This is my solution attempt

http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/2712/20112011a.jpg

http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/6539/20112011b.jpg ]


And here below in the thumbnail I have attached my friend's attempt. He's smart, but new to 3D statics, and I don't understand how what he did makes sense. In fact it contradicts my results and methods.
 

Attachments

  • sp1.jpg
    sp1.jpg
    32.5 KB · Views: 461
  • sp2.jpg
    sp2.jpg
    66.1 KB · Views: 493
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Femme_physics said:

I don't understand what your friend did.
It looks rather complex, but his answers are wrong.

I definitely prefer your method. :smile:
Reducing the problem to 2D makes it much easier to follow what you did.

However, you also made a mistake.
It starts with your zx-view, when you calculated TCEzx where you used TCEy, but you should have used TCEx.
Same for the calculation of TCEz.

As a consequence, your Bx, Ax, and Az are wrong too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
However, you also made a mistake.
It starts with your zx-view, when you calculated TCEzx where you used TCEy, but you should have used TCEx.
Same for the calculation of TCEz.

As a consequence, your Bx, Ax, and Az are wrong too.

*smacks forehead*

I'll tell you why, I'm used to "y" being up so I keep confusing myself :-p


Thanks a bunch :smile: will correct it today
 
Femme_physics said:
I'll tell you why, I'm used to "y" being up so I keep confusing myself :-p

But "y" is up! :confused: :-p
 
I like Serena said:
But "y" is up!:confused: :-p

It's "up" in the 3D drawing. But in the 2D ones, it's always psychologically my "up"-- something which I still haven't completely gotten rid off.
 
Femme_physics said:
It's "up" in the 3D drawing. But in the 2D ones, it's always psychologically my "up"-- something which I still haven't completely gotten rid off.

Uhh, it's up in 3D and it's up in your yx-view and it's up in your yz-view. :rolleyes:

It's just that in 3D normally z is always up, and in the yz-view z should be up too! :smile:
 
Yes, I said psychologically "up" as in the sense that's it's pointing towards the upper part of the page that I'm writing on heh, I still haven't gotten over it is what am saying
 
Still, in this problem y is pointing up to the physical top of your page.

I think you've gotten over that just fine! :smile:
You're already used to the fact that z should be pointing up to the physical top of your page.

The challenge in this problem is to apply the direction of the y-coordinate mathematically, carefully without making assumptions based on the 3D you're already used to.
That really makes this problem harder than it has to be. :wink:
 
Still, in this problem y is pointing up to the physical top of your page.
not if you're looking at the xz view
 
  • #10
Femme_physics said:
not if you're looking at the xz view

*smacks forehead*

Oooooooooooooooooooooooh!
(Thanks for clarifying that! :wink:)
 
  • #12
Yay! :smile:

You didn't ask for it, but I give it the ILSe-stamp-of-approval.
Btw, whatever happened to that item that I didn't put a stamp-of-approval on? :blushing:
 
  • #13
Maybe I didn't ask, but I secretly desired! :wink:
Thanks :mrgreen:

"Btw, whatever happened to that item that I didn't put a stamp-of-approval on?
"

To be amended, rest be assured! :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
49
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K