Are suvat equations valid in 2 dimensional motion for constant acceleration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vcsharp2003
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Suvat
AI Thread Summary
SUVAT equations can be applied in two-dimensional motion as long as the acceleration is constant and expressed as a vector. The equations can be resolved along chosen axes (x and y), allowing independent application to each component. This is particularly relevant in scenarios like projectile motion, where acceleration is not solely in the direction of motion. If acceleration is constant, the SUVAT equations remain valid, but they are not applicable if acceleration varies. Properly defining the axes can simplify the analysis, especially in the presence of external forces like electric fields.
vcsharp2003
Messages
913
Reaction score
179
Homework Statement
I saw the following in my book and it confused me. This was under the section on drift velocity of electrons In a conductor.

##\vec {v_1}= \vec {u_1} + \vec {a} t##

In the above equation, ##\vec {v_1}## is velocity of electron just before it collides with a fixed ion, ##\vec {u_1}## is the velocity of electron just after the last collision with another ion and ##\vec {a}## is the constant acceleration of the electron in question when a uniform electric field is applied to the conductor.
Relevant Equations
Suvat equations of motion
To my understanding, suvat equations must apply when motion is one dimensional and also the acceleration is constant pointing in the direction of motion or against the direction of motion. So I'm not sure about this.

Perhaps, the vector form just means that we can select an axes system (i.e. x and y axes) and resolve each vector in the suvat equation along this axes system; now we would have constant acceleration along x and y axes and we could apply the suvat equation to the x axis components and separately to the y axis components.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vcsharp2003 said:
To my understanding, suvat equations must apply when motion is one dimensional and also the acceleration is constant pointing in the direction of motion or against the direction of motion. So I'm not sure about this.
First of all your understanding is incomplete. Think of projectile motion. The SUVAT equations apply in this 2d case where the acceleration is not either in or against the direction of motion.

The drift velocity of electrons in a conductor is an average velocity in the direction of the acceleration which is opposite to the electric field established inside the conductor. See here for more details of the model.
 
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003
kuruman said:
First of all your understanding is incomplete.
So, it's correct to write the suvat equation in 2 dimensional motion or even 3 dimensional motion, provided the velocity, acceleration and displacement terms in the suvat equation are written as vectors. Right?

Was my second paragraph in my original question at attempting to explain this correct? I think so.
 
vcsharp2003 said:
Perhaps, the vector form just means that we can select an axes system (i.e. x and y axes) and resolve each vector in the suvat equation along this axes system; now we would have constant acceleration along x and y axes and we could apply the suvat equation to the x axis components and separately to the y axis components.
'suvat' equations apply in any arbitrary direction providing the acceleration is constant in that direction.

Another way to look at it is this: if ## \vec a## is constant, then so are its components ##a_x, a_y## and ##a_z## (using Cartesian coordinates). We can then independently apply 'suvat' equations in ##x, y## and ##z## directions:
##v_x = u_x + a_xt##
##v_y = u_y + a_yt##
##v_z = u_z + a_zt##

If an electric field acts in the (say) ##x##-direction, then the electric field accelerates a charged particle in the ##x##-direction only; ##a_y=a_z=0##. For example, when an electron moves through a metal with a field in the ##x##-direction,, the electron is alternately accelerated (speeding up) by the field and slowed down by each collision with the lattice. The time-average ##x##-component of velocity is the 'drift velocity' as already noted by @kuruman.

Minor edit.
 
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003 and malawi_glenn
vcsharp2003 said:
So, it's correct to write the suvat equation in 2 dimensional motion or even 3 dimensional motion, provided the velocity, acceleration and displacement terms in the suvat equation are written as vectors. Right?
Right, but with the provision that the acceleration is a constant vector, i.e. fixed magnitude and direction. If the acceleration is not constant, the SUVAT equations are not applicable.

vcsharp2003 said:
Was my second paragraph in my original question at attempting to explain this correct? I think so.
It is correct, but note that a good choice of axes is to have one of them, say the x-axis, in the direction of the electric field. Then the acceleration is in that direction only which simplifies the description.
 
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003
vcsharp2003 said:
it's correct to write the suvat equation in 2 dimensional motion or even 3 dimensional motion, provided the velocity, acceleration and displacement terms in the suvat equation are written as vectors. Right?
As others have pointed out, the SUVAT equations are valid if the acceleration vector is constant. More generally, ##\Delta\vec v=\int\vec a.dt##, ##\Delta \vec x=\int\vec v.dt##.

When ##\vec a## is constant, ##\Delta\vec v=\int\vec a.dt=\vec a\int.dt=\vec a\Delta t=\vec a(t-t_0)##, ##\Delta \vec x=\int\vec v.dt=\int(\vec{v_0}+\Delta\vec v).dt=\vec v_0\Delta t+\int\vec a(t-t_0).dt##
Taking the lower bound for t as zero:
##\Delta \vec x=\vec v_0 t+\vec a\int t.dt=\vec v_0 t+\frac 12\vec at^2##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top