Are the W bosons charged before symmetry breaking?

franoisbelfor
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
When the SU(2) symmetry is broken
by the Higgs mechanism,
the W bosons acquire mass
and become the well-known W^+ and W^-
bosons discovered at CERN.

So before the breaking, the Ws had no mass.
Did they have charge?

If yes: No particle is known
without mass but with charge. Are the W
before symmetry breaking the first?

If no: How does charge arise through
symmetry breaking?

Thanks for any help!

Francois
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Before" is maybe not the best word. There was, as far as we know, no time in the universe when the SU(2) X U(1) symmetry was unbroken. The time you are referring two is the time it takes to do the derivation - so your question really is closer to "between steps 5 and 6 in the derivation, do the w's have charge?" Note that these are not physical states.

One can do a similar thing with fermions and treat the left-handed and right-handed chiral projections as separate particles. These are also charged and massless - and also not physical states.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
"Before" is maybe not the best word. There was, as far as we know, no time in the universe when the SU(2) X U(1) symmetry was unbroken. The time you are referring two is the time it takes to do the derivation - so your question really is closer to "between steps 5 and 6 in the derivation, do the w's have charge?" Note that these are not physical states.

One can do a similar thing with fermions and treat the left-handed and right-handed chiral projections as separate particles. These are also charged and massless - and also not physical states.

Thank you! I see my mistake. So at energies far above the symmetry breaking scale, the W is still massive and charged, am I correct? The books sometime give the impression that at high energy, the symmetry is unbroken... I really got something mixed up there.

François
 
franoisbelfor said:
Thank you! I see my mistake. So at energies far above the symmetry breaking scale, the W is still massive and charged, am I correct? The books sometime give the impression that at high energy, the symmetry is unbroken..

Horrible books. It is as trying to learn of God by reading the Bible.

Anyway, yes, the point is that at very high energy the W is still massive but its mass is small for the calculations being done, so it can be taken as zero in order to simplify the calculation. But note that you can not put its charge to zero.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top