Are These Equations for Moment of Inertia Correct?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correct equations for moment of inertia. The user initially confuses torque with kinetic energy in the equation T=ml²ω² from Wikipedia. It is clarified that the correct relationship is moment of inertia equals torque divided by angular acceleration. The specific equation for a disk, I=0.5MR², is confirmed as accurate. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between torque and kinetic energy in understanding moment of inertia.
fisselt
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a lab where I have to go into some detail about moment of inertia. I understand the concept and everything but am a little confused by the equation that I found on wikipedia.
I've seen only two equations for this: momentum=torque divided by angular acceleration and
one specifically for a disk: I=.5MR2

On wikipedia I they have the equation: T=ml2\omega2
Wikipedia makes sense to me because I understand that as radius decreases momentum decreases at constant angular velocity. Neutron stars for instance maintain similar inertia at reduced radius but much higher angular velocity.

Are all 3 ways true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
momentum=torque divided by angular acceleration

I'm assuming you meant that moment of inertia = torque divided by angular acceleration, because what you have there isn't true (just look at the units.)

one specifically for a disk: I=.5MR2

I agree with this.

On wikipedia I they have the equation: T=ml2ω2

I'm assuming that you're referring to this page. You'll note that T is in fact the kinetic energy of the object and not the moment of inertia. You may have been confused just because T is similar to the symbol for torque, \tau.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top