Are these the correct skeletal formulas for all structural isomers of C5H10?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the skeletal formulas for all structural isomers of C5H10. The user shares their attempts and seeks confirmation on the accuracy of their drawings, specifically mentioning a mistake regarding a line from the corner of a square. There is also a query about the difference between two specific isomers, which the user notes appear identical. Participants in the thread provide feedback on the completeness and correctness of the isomers presented. The user expresses gratitude for the assistance and clarification received.
dwight87
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Draw the skeletal formula for all of the structural isomers of C5H10

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I attached a picture of what I got so far. Are they right and am I missing any. Thanks a lot.

I know that there should be another line coming from the corner of the square. My mistake.
 

Attachments

  • isomers.jpg
    isomers.jpg
    14.2 KB · Views: 2,968
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Explain the difference between 11 and 7.
 


They are exactly the same. Thanks for pointing that out. But are the rest right? Thanks again.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top