Are these the correct skeletal formulas for all structural isomers of C5H10?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the skeletal formulas for all structural isomers of C5H10. The user shares their attempts and seeks confirmation on the accuracy of their drawings, specifically mentioning a mistake regarding a line from the corner of a square. There is also a query about the difference between two specific isomers, which the user notes appear identical. Participants in the thread provide feedback on the completeness and correctness of the isomers presented. The user expresses gratitude for the assistance and clarification received.
dwight87
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Draw the skeletal formula for all of the structural isomers of C5H10

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I attached a picture of what I got so far. Are they right and am I missing any. Thanks a lot.

I know that there should be another line coming from the corner of the square. My mistake.
 

Attachments

  • isomers.jpg
    isomers.jpg
    14.2 KB · Views: 2,966
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Explain the difference between 11 and 7.
 


They are exactly the same. Thanks for pointing that out. But are the rest right? Thanks again.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

Similar threads

Back
Top