Courses Are these two optics courses too similar to justify taking?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vancouver_water
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Courses Optics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the potential overlap between two optics courses at a school, one from the electrical engineering department and the other from the physics department. The electrical engineering course focuses on practical applications such as waveguides, optical communications, and semiconductor lasers, using a textbook that emphasizes modern communications. In contrast, the physics course covers fundamental principles of optical physics, including interference, diffraction, and lasers, with a more theoretical approach and a lab component. There is a suggestion to consult course instructors for clarity on content overlap, as some institutions may restrict credit for similar courses. The physics instructor was unaware of the engineering course, indicating a lack of coordination between departments. The student expresses interest in quantum optics and integrated photonics, which may influence their decision on course selection.
vancouver_water
Messages
76
Reaction score
10
There are two courses at my school involving optics. I'm not sure if they are too similar that taking both would be a waste of time, or if they would be different enough that it would be ok to take both.

The first one is from the electrical engineering department, here is the course description:
Planar dielectric waveguides; single mode optical fibers; integrated optics waveguides and devices; semiconductor lasers; optical detectors; optical communications links.
It uses this textbook: “Photonics: Optical Electronics in Modern Communications”, by A. Yariv and P. Yeh, 6th Ed, 2007.

The other course is from the physics department:
Principles and applications of optical physics. Interference, diffraction, coherence, polarization, Fresnel relations, optical coatings, waves in dielectric media, Gaussian beams, waveguides, optical cavities, lasers, fibre optics, and Fourier optics.

with the textbook Classical and Modern Optics by Dan Steck.

If they are too similar I might replace one with a graduate statistical mechanics course. If not, I would take both.

What do you think? Keeping in mind I will for sure take this EM course:
Applications of Maxwell's theory. Wave propagation in dielectrics, conductors and plasmas, wave guides, radiation, antennae, and special relativity.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you ask the course instructors to compare for you the two courses and give you some guidance. I am sure they are aware of each other and they are best qualified to know how much their courses overlap. At some institutions, course descriptions offered by two different department and are substantially similar carry the statement "Credit not offered for both EE XXX and PHYS YYY." I would also suspect that the physics course is more likely to be more theoretical and less "hands on" than the EE course, especially if it is taught by a theoretical physicist.
 
I emailed the course instructor for the physics one. He was unaware that the EE one even existed. The Physics one is taught by an experimentalist and has a lab portion as well, so I think it would be a more applied course. I am interested in quantum optics and integrated photonics if that is any help.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Back
Top