Are these two phrases the sameI am not sure what it is asking for.

  • Thread starter Thread starter squirt552
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between the line of symmetry and its equation in quadratic functions. The first example provides a clear vertex and line of symmetry, while the second example seeks clarification on expressing the line of symmetry as an equation. Participants confirm that the line of symmetry can be represented as an equation, specifically x = -b/2a. The conversation emphasizes that if the line of symmetry is x = 5, it can be derived from the quadratic formula. Overall, the thread clarifies that the line of symmetry and its equation are indeed the same concept.
squirt552
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



First example f(x)=1/4 (x+4)^2 +7
Asks for vertex and the line of symmetry and the value of f(x) and maximim or minimum
This is no problem vertex= (-4,7) line of symmetry is -4 value f(x)= 7


second problem f(x)=x^2 -10x -2

vertex (5, -27)
but now ask for the equation of the line of symmetry


Is: the line of symmetry and: the equation of the line of symmetry the same thing?

information shows the line of symmetry is x= - b/2a. okay so how do I show this as an equation if the line of symmetry is 5

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi squirt552! Welcome to PF! :smile:
squirt552 said:
line of symmetry is -4 …

hmm … line of symmetry is x = -4 :wink:
Is: the line of symmetry and: the equation of the line of symmetry the same thing?

Well, you have to describe the line in some way, and the easiest (and only sensible) way is by using an equation, so … yes! :smile:
information shows the line of symmetry is x= - b/2a. okay so how do I show this as an equation if the line of symmetry is 5

(you mean x = 5)

Well, if the line of symmetry is x= - b/2a and x = 5,

then that means that - b/2a = … ? :smile:
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top