Are undefined constants valid in trig equations when other constants present?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sduibek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Trig
AI Thread Summary
Undefined constants in trigonometric equations, such as when evaluating tan at odd multiples of π/2, lead to invalid results for certain identities. The identity tan(a-b) = (tan a - tan b) / (1 + tan a tan b) fails if either angle or their difference is an odd multiple of π/2. However, limits can be used to approach these undefined values, allowing for the calculation of limiting behaviors, such as tan(π/2 - x) equating to cot x. While informal calculations may overlook these limits for convenience, they remain mathematically incorrect. Understanding the conditions under which trigonometric identities hold is crucial for accurate problem-solving.
Sduibek
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
For example:

tan(pi/2 - pi/4) = (tan(pi/2) - tan(pi/4) ) / 1 + tan(pi/2)tan(pi/4)

Which of course comes out to:

undefined + 1 / 1 + undefined

Does that equal 1, or equal Undefined/No Solution?sorry for the poor formatting, I couldn't find the mathprint symbols for pi and fractions
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sduibek said:
For example:

tan(pi/2 - pi/4) = (tan(pi/2) - tan(pi/4) ) / 1 + tan(pi/2)tan(pi/4)

Which of course comes out to:

undefined + 1 / 1 + undefined

Does that equal 1, or equal Undefined/No Solution?


sorry for the poor formatting, I couldn't find the mathprint symbols for pi and fractions

Trig identities are only valid if the various quantities are defined. So, for example, the formula$$
\tan(a-b) = \frac {\tan a - \tan b}{1 + \tan a \tan b}$$does not apply if either of the angles or their difference is an odd multiple of ##\pi/2##. [Edited, thanks for catching that Curious3141]
 
Last edited:
LCKurtz said:
Trig identities are only valid if the various quantities are defined. So, for example, the formula$$
\tan(a-b) = \frac {\tan a - \tan b}{1 + \tan a \tan b}$$does not apply if either of the angles or their difference is a multiple of ##\pi/2##.

Okay, thank you!
 
LCKurtz said:
Trig identities are only valid if the various quantities are defined. So, for example, the formula$$
\tan(a-b) = \frac {\tan a - \tan b}{1 + \tan a \tan b}$$does not apply if either of the angles or their difference is a multiple of ##\pi/2##.

(Just to correct a small error, the expression *is* perfectly valid if either or both of the angles is an even multiple of \frac{\pi}{2}).

Whilst this is strictly true (for odd multiples of \frac{\pi}{2}), one can actually use the angle sum identities to calculate the limiting values of expressions.

For example, we know that \tan (\frac{\pi}{2} - x) = \cot x

We can prove this easily with a right triangle, but we can also view this as the limit of this expression:

\lim_{y \rightarrow \frac{\pi}{2}} \tan (y - x) = \lim_{y \rightarrow \frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{\tan y - \tan x}{1 + \tan x\tan y} where x \neq \frac{(2n+1)\pi}{2}.

Since approaching the limit, |\tan y| >> |\tan x|, the limit becomes:

\lim_{y \rightarrow \frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{\tan y}{\tan x\tan y} = \frac{1}{\tan x} = \cot x, as expected.

Usually, when I do rough work "informally", I don't bother with the limits, I just put the values as \tan \frac{\pi}{2} directly. But of course, I'm aware this is mathematically incorrect, just a convenient shorthand.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top