Fukushima Are US Nuclear Power Plants Prepared for Earthquakes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has published a proposed schedule to implement 12 post-Fukushima recommendations for nuclear power plants, emphasizing the need for enhanced safety measures. Nuclear plants are designed to withstand earthquakes, and the NRC requires seismic considerations in their design and maintenance. Recent seismic data indicates that potential hazards may have increased for some plants in central and eastern states, but all operating plants remain deemed safe without immediate action. The NRC is evaluating whether to adopt permanent or portable solutions for spent fuel pool cooling, referencing a portable system developed during the Fukushima incident. Overall, the NRC continues to issue guidelines and draft orders to ensure nuclear facilities are prepared for seismic events.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,340
Reaction score
7,138
NRC publishes proposed post-Fukushima action schedule
http://www.neimagazine.com/story.asp?storyCode=2060916
18 October 2011

Staff of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission have published a proposed schedule to implement the 12 post-Fukushima recommendations that it issued in July 2011 for US nuclear power plants.
. . . .

NRC Task Force Report (July 12, 2011): http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1118/ML111861807.pdf

http://www.nrc.gov/japan/japan-info.html

This is coincidental with the NRC program on seismic issues related to NPPs.

Nuclear power plants are built to withstand environmental hazards, including earthquakes. Even those plants that are located outside of areas with extensive seismic activity are designed for safety in the event of such a natural disaster. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requires all of its licensees to take seismic activity into account when designing and maintaining its nuclear power plants. When new seismic hazard information becomes available, the NRC evaluates the new data and models and determines if any changes are needed at plants. The newest seismic data suggests that although the potential seismic hazard at some nuclear power plants in central and eastern states may have increased beyond previous estimates, all operating nuclear plants remain safe with no need for immediate action.
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/fs-seismic-issues.pdf


Please keep subsequent posts related to US NRC and US nuclear plants.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
With regard to design basis scenarios and spent fuel pool cooling/instrumentation, is the NRC looking at permanent installation or leaning more towards portable equipment? During the Fukushima accident, Westinghouse created a portable spent fuel pool cooling system. I don't know any technical details of it, however I was able to find this article.

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS-New_system_to_keep_fuel_pools_cool-2605117.html
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Replies
2K
Views
447K
Replies
73
Views
23K
Replies
50
Views
9K
Replies
45
Views
10K
Back
Top