Are x1, x2, and x3 linearly dependent in R^n?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DMOC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that the vectors y1, y2, and y3, derived from the linearly independent vectors x1, x2, and x3 in R^n, are indeed linearly dependent. The user demonstrates this by constructing a matrix from the vectors and finding that the row echelon form contains a free variable, indicating dependence. Specifically, y3 can be expressed as a linear combination of y1 and y2, validating the conclusion that y1, y2, and y3 are not independent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear independence and dependence in vector spaces
  • Familiarity with matrix row echelon form
  • Knowledge of determinants and their role in linear algebra
  • Basic proficiency in R^n vector notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear combinations in vector spaces
  • Learn how to compute determinants for various matrix sizes
  • Explore the concept of free variables in linear algebra
  • Investigate applications of linear independence in higher-dimensional spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts of vector independence and dependence.

DMOC
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
y1 = x2 - x1

y2 = x3 - x2

y3 = x3 - x1

x1, x2, x3 are linearly independent in R^n

Is that true for y1 y2 and y3?

---

Well, normally with linear indepence problems, I can set up a matrix and check to see if the row echelon form has free variables or not, or I can calculate the determinant of a square matrix. Here, I'm just given vectors x1 x2 and x3. What I did was set up a matrix like this with x1 as the first row, x2 as the second, and x3 as the third:

-1 1 0 = 0
0 -1 1 = 0
-1 0 1 = 0

And I end up with the following matrix

1 0 -1 0
0 1 -1 0
0 0 0 0

So I assume these vectors are linearly dependent (not independent) due to the free "variable" of x3?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Or you might note y3 = y1 + y2.
 
Yes, that should be correct ... my bad. But would the longer method be valid? i.e. mathematically legal?
 
DMOC said:
Yes, that should be correct ... my bad. But would the longer method be valid? i.e. mathematically legal?

Yes.
 
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K