Are You Ready to Challenge Your Integral Solving Skills?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gib Z
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the request for indefinite integrals to challenge and improve integral solving skills. The original poster expresses difficulty with specific integrals, particularly involving sqrt(tan(x)) and the integral of 1/(2 + sin(x)). Participants suggest various substitution methods, including using tan(x/2) and u = tan(x), while also discussing integration techniques such as integration by parts and partial fractions. There is a focus on providing hints and guidance rather than direct solutions, fostering a collaborative learning environment. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of practice and community support in mastering calculus concepts.
  • #121
murshid_islam said:
how did you get this:

This is a standard result
\int_{0}^{a}f(x)dx= \int_{0}^{a}f(a-x)dx<br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #122
If you say so?...I've never seen that before...
 
  • #123
ssd, can you show me how to prove this?:
ssd said:
\int_{0}^{a}f(x)dx= \int_{0}^{a}f(a-x)dx

edit: ok i think i got it. by substituting a - x = u, i get,
\int_{0}^{a}f(a-x)dx = -\int_{a}^{0}f(u)du = \int_{0}^{a}f(x)dx
 
Last edited:
  • #124
And that proof works how? I can't see how the 2nd part equals the 3rd.
 
  • #125
Gib Z said:
And that proof works how? I can't see how the 2nd part equals the 3rd.

The variables u and x are just (dummy) integration variables, so from going from the second part to the third, let u=x. Then noting that \int_a^bf(z)=F(b)-F(a)=-[F(a)-F(b)]=-\int_b^a f(z) where F(z) is an antiderivative of f(z), yields the result.
 
Last edited:
  • #126
ssd said:
\int_{0}^{\pi}\frac{\theta\sin\theta}{1 + \cos^4\theta}d\theta<br /> =\int_{0}^{\pi}\frac{\pi\sin\theta}{1 + \cos^4\theta}d\theta<br /> - \int_{0}^{\pi}\frac{\theta\sin\theta}{1 + \cos^4\theta}d\theta<br />
Move the 2nd integral to left to get 2I, I=the original integral.
For the first integral put z=cos\theta
even then it becomes messy. i get,
I = \pi \int_{0}^{1}\frac{dz}{1 + z^4}
i have read that even leibniz found this cumbersome. i have to complete the squares in the denominator, then split into partial fractions and so on...
 
Last edited:
  • #127
cristo said:
I don't think a trig sub will work. Try writing the denominator as (u^2-\sqrt 2u+1)(u^2+\sqrt 2u+1), then use partial fractions. It should work, but it won't be pretty!

There's a pretty way to do that integral. Involves some trickery.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=127563
 
  • #128
murshid_islam said:
even then it becomes messy. i get,
I = \pi \int_{0}^{1}\frac{dz}{1 + z^4}
i have read that even leibniz found this cumbersome. i have to complete the squares in the denominator, then split into partial fractions and so on...
The process is cumbersome no doubt but the problem is such...By the way I found it interesting.
 
  • #129
Gib Z said:
And that proof works how? I can't see how the 2nd part equals the 3rd.
\int_{a}^{b}f(u)du = \int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx = F(b)-F(a)<br />
where, f(y) is the first derivative of F(y) w.r.t. y.
 
  • #130
K thanks guys, got it. As for that integral you have left, I feel sorry for you >.<
 
  • #131
ssd said:
The process is cumbersome no doubt but the problem is such...By the way I found it interesting.
i found the integral interesting too, even if it is cumbersome.
 
  • #132
O well, let's revive this thread again. Anybody have another, single variable, indefinite integral? It doesn't even have to be from a textbook, it can be your homework, or one your having trouble with :D
 
  • #133
here is an extremely easy one:

\int_{-1}^{1}x^3e^{-x^{4}}\cos 2xdx

although it is very easy, i found it interesting
 
  • #134
Ahh I am thinking integration by parts, u=x^3e^{-x^4}, and dv = cos 2x, and integration by parts again on the u, but could you just tell me if I am right before I do it, i don't want to spend so much time on it if it won't get me anywhere lol.
 
  • #135
0

There are hard ways and easy ways. (Try graphing it. Notice any symmetry?)Try

\int_-90000 ^90000 sin^57(x) e^{-\pi^{77} 234535x^88}cos(2453245x^4) (x^{99999994}+1)dx
 
  • #136
Gib Z said:
Ahh I am thinking integration by parts, u=x^3e^{-x^4}, and dv = cos 2x, and integration by parts again on the u, but could you just tell me if I am right before I do it, i don't want to spend so much time on it if it won't get me anywhere lol.

It might be doable that way, but I doubt it. Note that this is a definite integral, what is special about the bounds? What is special about the function?
 
  • #137
:D:D:D

Thanks a heap guys, I can't believe I didn't see that. I already noticed it was an odd function, but for some reason didn't make the connection.

The Answers 0 :).

As for gammamcc's one, I am just going to put the tex brackets that he forgot to over here, because I don't understand it written like that, then ill try it.

\int_{-90000}^{90000} \sin^{57} (x) e^{-\pi^{77} 234535x^{88}}\cos (2453245x^4) (x^{99999994}+1) dx
 
  • #138
Thats an odd function as well...so the answers zero again...
 
  • #139
Gib Z said:
Ahh I am thinking integration by parts, u=x^3e^{-x^4}, and dv = cos 2x, and integration by parts again on the u, but could you just tell me if I am right before I do it, i don't want to spend so much time on it if it won't get me anywhere lol.
you don't need any calculations at all. that's why i said it is extremely easy.
just look at the function x^3e^{-x^{4}}\cos 2x. do you see anything? is it odd? even? then you can immediately see what the answer is.

edit: oh, sorry, you have already got help. didn't notice that.
 
  • #140
And as I just realized, that integral is not expressible in terms of elementary functions...

EDIT: INDEFINITE integral i meant to say.
 
Last edited:
  • #141
Gib Z said:
And as I just realized, that integral is not expressible in terms of elementary functions...

EDIT: INDEFINITE integral i meant to say.
how did you realize that?

i have another integral. i don't know how to do it. can anybody help?

\int_{0}^{\infty}x^ne^{x^2}dx
 
  • #142
I worked out the taylor series and integrated term by term, this is my best:

\int_0^{\infty} x^{a} e^{x^2} dx =\lim_{x\rightarrow {\infty}} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^{a+(2n+1)}}{n!\cdot (a+(2n+1))}

That doesn't help much
 
  • #143
murshid_islam said:
how did you realize that?

i have another integral. i don't know how to do it. can anybody help?

\int_{0}^{\infty}x^ne^{x^2}dx

It diverges.
 
  • #144
Looking at the summation again, It looks like it does lol.
EDIT: Or one could see that both are increasing functions, which i just noticed and am starting to feel stupid about for not noticing sooner.
 
  • #145
what about \int_{0}^{\infty}x^ne^{-x^2}dx
 
  • #146
murshid_islam said:
what about \int_{0}^{\infty}x^ne^{-x^2}dx
Putting z=x^2,

\int_{0}^{\infty}x^ne^{-x^2}dx<br /> =\frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}z^{\frac{n+1}{2}-1}e^{-z}dz
Apart from the factor 1/2, the integral is a Gamma Integral with parameters (n+1)/2,1.
If (n+1)/2 is a positive integer, then the integral = 0.5[(n-1)/2]! ... (Gamma distribution is known as Erlang distribution if the shape parameter is an integer.)
 
Last edited:
  • #147
what if (n+1)/2 is not an integer?
 
  • #148
It becomes \frac{1}{2}\Gamma(\frac{n+1}{2}).

Which can be approximated...no closed form (in general).
 
  • #149
Closed forms can be generated for any integer n with the following identities:

\Gamma(z) \; \Gamma\left(z + \frac{1}{2}\right) = 2^{1-2z} \; \sqrt{\pi} \; \Gamma(2z). \,\!

And

\Gamma\left(\frac{n}{2}+1\right)= \sqrt{\pi}\, \frac{n!}{2^{(n+1)/2}} (n odd)
 
  • #150
Lol its been a while since I've posted here. Anybody got an interesting integral?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K