How Does ARPES Measure the Lifetime of Injected Photo Holes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fk08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hole Life Time
fk08
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Why it is said that ARPES measures the lifetime of the injected photo hole?
When photons with certain energy promote electrons from the initial state to the final state with kinetic energy then by knowing the photon energy one can simply determine the binding energy of the initial state: Eb = hv - Ekin - W(orkfunction).

I do not see the connection to the hole lifetime.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fk08 said:
Why it is said that ARPES measures the lifetime of the injected photo hole?
When photons with certain energy promote electrons from the initial state to the final state with kinetic energy then by knowing the photon energy one can simply determine the binding energy of the initial state: Eb = hv - Ekin - W(orkfunction).

I do not see the connection to the hole lifetime.

You can't get it that way.

What you need to do is look at the energy distribution curve (EDC) of the ARPES spectrum at a particular momentum. This represents what we call the spectral function, A(k,w), at that particular k value. If this is a regular, Fermi-liquid-type quasiparticle, there will be a well-defined peak in the spectrum that closely resembles a Lorentizian. The width of that peak (or full-width at half maximum) corresponds to the inverse-lifetime of the quasiparticle, or photo-hole.

See, for example, Valla et al., Science v.285, p.2110 (1999).

Zz.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top