Arrangement of Charges: Solving Homework Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter unscientific
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


33wqo44.png



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



3582el4.png


I've managed to do the first parts up till part (a) and part (b), where I have some questions:

2. how do you know where the E-field is zero? Is it in the region of space where there's some sort of special pattern?

I've found the PE of the system..

But for the last part, I'm tempted to say by the conservation of energy it shouldn't matter how you release them but I can't seem to prove it..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your sketch isn't quite right.
At sufficient distance from the ensemble, you can treat the charges as being effectively at the same point. What does that tell you about the field there? What can you deduce from that regarding those field lines that terminate at the negative charge?
Once you have the sketch right, you should see points where there are no field lines.
Another hint is to look at [STRIKE]the triangle formed by the two positive charges and the point C[/STRIKE]. See if you can determine which way the field lines would go (into or out of the triangle) at points along its periphery.

Edit: That triangle wasn't a suitable region. To do what I was trying to do with that you have to pick a region which does not include any of the charges, not even on its boundary. There is a zero field point in that triangle, but I'm not sure of the best way to prove it.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top