Charged massive particle reacting to EM wave

In summary, the naive model for the pressure of light is flawed because the velocity is 90 degrees out of phase with the fields. Including a damping constant γ, results in a negative force. Using the equations for energy and momentum, the particle's velocity and magnetic force are found. The particle's average velocity and magnetic force are both zero.
  • #1
RawrSpoon
18
0

Homework Statement


Consider a particle of charge q and mass m, free to move in the xy plane in response to an electromagnetic wave propagating in the z direction (might as well set δ to zero)

a) Ignoring the magnetic force, find the velocity of the particle, as a function of time. (Assume the average velocity is zero).

b) Now calculate the resulting magnetic force on the particle

c) Show that the (time) average magnetic force is zero.

The problem with this naive model for the pressure of light is that the velocity is 90 degrees out of phase with the fields. For energy to be absorbed, there's got to be some resistance to the motion of the charges. Suppose we include a force of the form -γmv, for some damping constant γ.

d) Repeat part (a) (ignore the exponentially damped transient). Repeat part (b), and find the average magnetic force on the particle.

Homework Equations


[tex]E(zt) = E_0 cos(k z-\omega t + \delta)\hat{x}[/tex]
[tex]B(zt) =\frac{1}{c} E_0 cos(k z-\omega t + \delta)\hat{z}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


So I got a,b, and c I'm pretty sure. A quick look over my work by you guys wouldn't be hurtful, I don't think. Thing is, I can't find the solutions manual for the fourth edition of Griffiths's "Introduction to Electrodynamics" anywhere, and this seems to be a new problem.

a) I figured that since we're finding the velocity of this while ignoring the magnetic field, we can find the velocity simply through
[tex]\int \! F \, \mathrm{d}t=p=mv[/tex]
That
[tex]v=\frac{\int \! F \, \mathrm{d}t}{m}[/tex]
As such, I got
[tex]v(t)=-\frac{qE_0}{\omega m}sin(kz-\omega t)\hat{x}[/tex]

b) With this velocity, I remembered that
[tex]F=qv \times B[/tex]
So with this knowledge, I found that
[tex]F=\frac{q^2E_0^2}{c \omega m}sin(kz-\omega t)cos(kz-\omega t)\hat{y}[/tex]

c) The average of a function is
[tex]\frac{1}{T}\int_0^T \! f(t) \, \mathrm{d}t[/tex]

So I found the average of the force over a complete cycle. Because we're in a complete cycle, I realized I had to use
[tex]\omega=\frac{2\pi}{T}[/tex]
Upon doing the substitution and the integral, I proved the answer was 0. Simple enough.

Now, the part that's really killing me is d. I figure I solve it the same way except the force is replaced with
[tex]F=qE-\gamma mv[/tex] However, this isn't proving to be fruitful, as I'm not really sure how to deal with the retarding force. At first I tried the same approach as in part a, with v being replaced as dx/dt which gave me
[tex]\int \gamma m \mathrm{d}x[/tex] but that didn't make sense to me, since it'd mean that the retarding force would be based on the position? That doesn't really sit right with me.

I'm open to any suggestions as to where to head to next, and whether or not I'm doing this correctly at all! Thank you so much in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
RawrSpoon said:
since it'd mean that the retarding force would be based on the position?
It will, indirectly, as velocity depends on position (which you don't know yet).

##F=qE-\gamma mv## leads to a differential equation. Did you try solving this?
 
  • #3
Funnily enough I JUST tried it about 30ish minutes ago. I think I did it wrong though, it's kind of a large equation and, to be fair, I let Mathematica solve it for me. Anyway, I tried the following
[tex]m\frac{dv}{dt}+\gamma mv=qE_0cos(kz-\omega t)[/tex]
which led me to
[tex]v(t)=\frac{qE_0}{m(\gamma ^2+\omega ^2)}(\gamma cos(kz-\omega t)-\omega sin(kz-\omega t))\hat{x}+C_1 e^{-\gamma t} \hat{x}[/tex]
Which looks incredibly complicated. I put in v(0)=0 and got
[tex]v(t)=\frac{qE_0}{m(\gamma ^2+\omega ^2)}\bigg( \Big( \gamma cos(kz-\omega t)-\omega sin(kz-\omega t) \Big)-e^{-\gamma t}\big(\gamma cos(kz) - \omega sin(kz)\big)\bigg) \hat{x}[/tex]

Seems really complicated. Am I on the right track or should the answer be simpler?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
The answer looks great, but don't use v(0)=0.
You can neglect the exponential term (see problem statement), then you get an oscillation that is shifted in phase with respect to the original oscillation. That's exactly what you need to get radiation pressure.
 
  • #5
If I'm understanding you correctly, that means that C1 is 0, right? At least for these purposes.

As such I get that
[tex]F_{mag}=\frac{q^2E_0^2}{mc(\gamma^2+\omega^2)}\Big(\gamma cos^2(kz-\omega t)-\omega sin(kz-\omega t)cos(kz-\omega t)\Big)\hat{z}[/tex]

Which would give me an average of
[tex]\frac{q^2E_0^2\gamma}{2mc(\gamma^2+\omega^2)}\hat{z}[/tex]

I think I did it right, the solutions don't have striking errors I don't think?

I can't seem to edit the original post, but the y hat in part b should be a z hat, just a minor correction.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Looks right, the units match and it makes sense in terms of physics. I didn't check the prefactor.

RawrSpoon said:
I can't seem to edit the original post, but the y hat in part b should be a z hat, just a minor correction.
I fixed it.
 

1. How does a charged particle react to an electromagnetic wave?

When a charged particle is placed in an electromagnetic (EM) wave, it will experience a force known as the Lorentz force. This force will cause the charged particle to oscillate back and forth, with the amplitude and frequency of the oscillation depending on the strength and frequency of the EM wave.

2. What factors affect the reaction of a charged particle to an EM wave?

The reaction of a charged particle to an EM wave is influenced by several factors, including the charge and mass of the particle, the strength and frequency of the EM wave, and the direction of the wave in relation to the particle's motion.

3. How does the motion of the charged particle affect its reaction to an EM wave?

The motion of the charged particle plays a significant role in its reaction to an EM wave. If the particle is moving in the same direction as the wave, it will experience a stronger Lorentz force and a larger amplitude of oscillation. If the particle is moving perpendicular to the wave, it will experience a weaker Lorentz force and a smaller amplitude of oscillation.

4. Can a charged particle absorb energy from an EM wave?

Yes, a charged particle can absorb energy from an EM wave through the process of resonance. When the frequency of the EM wave matches the natural frequency of the charged particle's oscillation, the particle will absorb energy from the wave and increase its amplitude of oscillation.

5. How is the reaction of a charged particle to an EM wave used in practical applications?

The reaction of charged particles to EM waves is utilized in a variety of practical applications, including communication technologies such as radios and cell phones, medical imaging techniques like MRI, and energy production through nuclear fusion. It is also studied in particle accelerators to better understand the fundamental properties of matter.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
947
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
824
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
942
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top