Artice M. David: The Fourier Transform

goodness52200
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone ^^

Why I can say "The Fourier transform tells us " how much sinusoid" there is in the waveform at a given frequency "w""

Form Linear circuit analysis by Artice M. David

thanks a lot
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It is meant in the following sense...

if you take the Fourier transform of a function F(x), the result is a function A(w), right?

\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}F(x)e^{-iwx}dx=A(w)

Well it turns out that this function A(w) is such that

F(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}A(w)e^{iwx}dw

i.e. A(w) is the amplitude of the sine wave e^{iwx} of frequency w. So the bigger A is for a given w, the bigger the contribution of this sine wave in the integral making up F(x).

You must think in terms of analogy with Fourier series.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top