Objects seek to minimize free energy rather than just energy, influenced by thermodynamic potentials and system constraints. The second law of thermodynamics indicates that a thermodynamic potential must be minimized. To understand the perception of mass increase at high speeds, studying special relativity is essential, as the rest mass remains constant and the concept of increasing mass with velocity is outdated. Resources such as Feynman's lectures are recommended for deeper understanding. This discussion emphasizes the importance of thermodynamics and relativity in grasping these concepts.
#1
oneat
3
0
Do you know what should I read to understand why everything wants to have the smallest energy and why every object which is approaching light speed puts on mass?
Actually not everything wants to have smallest energy. It rather wants to have the smallest free energy, which can be one of the 4 potentials in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamic_free_energy
Which one exactly depends on the system constraints.
One can derive from the second law of thermodynamics, that a thermodynamic potential has to be minimized!
So you'd need to read about thermodynamics potentials and even more importantly the so called "availability".
To learn why the mass seems to increase you'd have to study special relativity. Well, the rest mass does not increase. So in fact forget that there is any mass apart from the rest mass (which is constant). The other thing is only energy. It is an outdated view that there is something called mass which increases with velocity.
How much do you know so far? What sort of understanding do you need?
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
i want to just test a linear generator with galvanometer , the magnet is N28 and the wire (Cu) is of 0.6mm thikness and 10m long , but galvanometer dont show anthing ,
The core is PLA material (3d printed)
The magnet size if 28mm * 10mm * 5mm
If the universe is fundamentally probabilistic, and all possible outcomes are realized in some branch of the multiverse, does that invalidate the concept of scientific inquiry? If knowledge is merely a description of one particular branch of reality, does it have any inherent value?