Assume that the earth is perfectly round

  • Thread starter Thread starter bullroar_86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the weight difference of a 100 kg person at the equator versus the poles due to Earth's rotation. It is established that gravitational acceleration at the equator is approximately 0.03 m/s² less than at the poles. The user is uncertain whether to use a gravitational constant of 9.8 m/s² or 9.83 m/s² for calculations, leading to slight variations in the resultant weight. The importance of using precise values for gravitational acceleration is emphasized, as rounding can introduce significant errors. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the need to clarify the gravitational constant before determining the weight difference accurately.
bullroar_86
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
r = 6400 km

how much less does a 100kg person weigh at the equator than at the poles because of the rotation of the earth?


Ok I have figured out that g(equator) is .03 m/s^2 less than it is at the poles due to the rotation on the earth.

so
F(pole) = (100kg)(g)

and

F(equator) = 100kg(g - .03m/s^2)



My question is what should be the value for g in this case?
If i make g = 9.8, then it will be 9.77 at the equator

or should it be g = 9.83 ... making it 9.80 at the equator.

not a big difference, but I'm just wondering which one is correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bullroar_86 said:
r = 6400 km

how much less does a 100kg person weigh at the equator than at the poles because of the rotation of the earth?


Ok I have figured out that g(equator) is .03 m/s^2 less than it is at the poles due to the rotation on the earth.

so
F(pole) = (100kg)(g)

and

F(equator) = 100kg(g - .03m/s^2)



My question is what should be the value for g in this case?
If i make g = 9.8, then it will be 9.77 at the equator

or should it be g = 9.83 ... making it 9.80 at the equator.

not a big difference, but I'm just wondering which one is correct.
It should be less. Your centrifugal force is counteracting the force of gravity leaving a net force less than the force of gravity alone. (A good clue is that the problem asked how much less does a person weigh.)

Of course, the problem with this problem is that all of your numbers are rounded to 2 significant digits and you're adjusting the third significant digit. The equatorial radius is actually 6378.137 km and the force of gravity at the equator is actually 9.798 m/s^2. The percentage error due to rounding off is greater than the percentage of the adjustment due to centrifugal force.

Of course, the choice of numbers used probably isn't up to you, so you have to go with what you've been given.
 
bullroar_86 said:
r = 6400 km

how much less does a 100kg person weigh at the equator than at the poles because of the rotation of the earth?


Ok I have figured out that g(equator) is .03 m/s^2 less than it is at the poles due to the rotation on the earth.

so
F(pole) = (100kg)(g)

and

F(equator) = 100kg(g - .03m/s^2)



My question is what should be the value for g in this case?
If i make g = 9.8, then it will be 9.77 at the equator

or should it be g = 9.83 ... making it 9.80 at the equator.

not a big difference, but I'm just wondering which one is correct.

Take the difference between your two forces before substituting in a value for g. Simplify the result. Then think about your final question again.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top