Asteroid Impact: Risk of Debris & Intact Objects on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter projection
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Impact
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dangers posed by an asteroid impact, particularly focusing on the debris generated during such an event. It highlights that the global risk primarily arises from debris released into the atmosphere, which can significantly affect climate. If an asteroid were to remain intact upon impact, the conversation speculates on whether the consequences would be localized rather than global. However, it is noted that most ejecta from impacts comes from the Earth itself, and large impactors typically vaporize upon collision. The Meteor Crater in Arizona serves as an example, illustrating how a relatively small impactor can create massive destruction, equivalent to the energy of hundreds of Hiroshima bombs. Furthermore, the potential for mega-tsunamis, forest fires, and seismic activity from such impacts is emphasized, suggesting that even an intact object could still lead to catastrophic global effects.
projection
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Is the biggest danger of an asteroid hitting Earth the debris released from the asteroid? Looking at general articles it seems that the global risk arises from the debris released into the atmosphere which would affect climate.

What would happen if no debris was released? I mean, if the object that hit Earth remained intact. Like in a sci-fi film you have a spaceship that crashes onto earth. If the object is made of a metal strong enough to remain intact, would it still be a global event from the debris generated from the Earth? Or would it just be felt in the locally.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
That vast majority (> 99.9%) of the ejecta from a moderate-sized to large impactor comes from the Earth itself. Regarding your "metal strong enough to remain intact": Another name for that metal is unobtanium. Scientists haven't quite nailed down the exact characteristics of this material precisely because it is unobtainable.

Large impactors tend to vaporize on impact. Even moderate sized ones tend to do so. Meteor Crater, Arizona is good example. This crater was caused by an impactor with a diameter of about 50 meters. The impact created a crater 2000 times larger (in volume) than the impactor itself. The impact was the equivalent of about 700 Hiroshima bombs all concentrated in one space.
 
If it hit the ocean, which is highly likely, there is also the mega-tsunamis. The heat generated also has the potential to start enormous forest fires.
 
What about an impact so powerful that it triggers massive earthquakes, tsunamis and creates volcanic activity like the Siberian Traps? I would imagine something like that if the bolite was not destroyed upon intrance or impact.
 
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Back
Top