Asteroid orbit determination from observations

AI Thread Summary
Calculating an asteroid's orbit requires multiple nights of observations to derive the six orbital elements using celestial mechanics. Introductory texts often focus on Keplerian Laws and orbit geometry, but the integration of observational data is crucial for accurate orbit determination. Observers provide time and position data (RA, Dec), but distances are not directly measurable and must be inferred through methodology. The influence of the sun's distance on the asteroid's trajectory is significant, allowing for the determination of all six degrees of freedom when measurements are spaced over time. Numerical evaluation is suggested as the most effective method for this complex calculation.
solarblast
Messages
146
Reaction score
2
It is said in the literature, I believe, one needs several nights of observations to calculate an orbit for, say,an asteroid. Using celestial mechanics mathematics and methodology, one produces the six orbital elements. It seems to me that most introductory texts on the subject, talk about Keplerian Laws, and the geometry of an orbit. Physics too, but how do observations fit into all this to finally produce the "orbit".

An observer is only reporting time and position (RA, Dec), so how do distances figure into this? An observer cannot provide them. Do they fall out of the methodology I refer to above?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Without gravity, it would be impossible to measure all 6 degrees of freedom - you could always scale distance and velocity by arbitrary factors, and determine just 5 parameters. However, the distance to the sun influences the bending of the asteroid path. Therefore, if the measurements have some time in between, you can determine all 6 degrees of freedom. I don't think there are simple formulas for that (maybe there are), and the best way is probably a numerical evaluation.
 
Missed part of the above. "This link is more to the point."
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top