Astronaut's Kinetic Energy inside shuttle at liftoff

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the kinetic energy of astronauts during the space shuttle's liftoff. It clarifies that kinetic energy is determined by velocity, not acceleration, meaning astronauts have zero kinetic energy relative to the Earth at the moment of takeoff. As the shuttle accelerates during liftoff, the astronauts' kinetic energy increases, but it is initially zero at the moment of lift-off. The conversation also touches on the shuttle's acceleration, noting that it is slightly less than gravity at takeoff. Overall, understanding the relationship between kinetic energy and velocity is crucial for discussing astronaut safety during launch and landing.
ctamasi
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I'm writing a report on the principles of physics and their application to the design of the astronaut space suit helmet. I have to discuss various factors that must be accounted for when designing it, and also, how it protects the astronaut during liftoff and landing.

My question is a really simple question, but I can't remember what the answer is;

When the space shuttle is lifting off, its acceleration is obviously high, which means that its kinetic energy is also high;

\vec{v} = \vec{a}\Deltat

EK = \frac{1}{2}mv2

does this mean that the kinetic energy of the astronauts inside the shuttle is also high? And if so, does this high kinetic energy have anything to do with body heat?

Thanks a lot guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ctamasi said:
When the space shuttle is lifting off, its acceleration is obviously high, which means that its kinetic energy is also high.
Kinetic energy is a function of velocity, not acceleration. The kinetic energy of an astronaut at the moment the shuttle takes off is exactly equal to that of a spectator on the ground watching the shuttle take off: Zero. (Relative to the Earth that is; since velocity is relative so is kinetic energy.)
 
Why do you say that the shuttle's acceleration is high? It isn't; at take-off, it's actually slightly less than the acceleration due to gravity.
 
Sorry I don't actually mean at the second the suttle lifts off, but what about during lift off, as its displacement is increasing. Or, what about when the shuttle passes through Earth's atmosphere?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top