Astronomy Help: Minimum Mass of Stars & Sun's Energy Production Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter karol17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two questions about stellar physics and the Sun's energy production. The minimum mass of a star, currently understood to be 0.08 solar masses, may change if helium were the primary fuel instead of hydrogen, prompting considerations of nuclear fusion processes. The Sun's luminosity, equivalent to the energy output of 3.9 x 10^24 100-watt light bulbs, raises questions about the actual energy produced per second, which is indeed equal to its luminosity. Participants clarify the relationship between watts and joules, emphasizing that a watt represents one joule per second. The conversation highlights confusion over the assignment's complexity and the need for a better understanding of fundamental concepts in astronomy.
karol17
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey
can someone help me with the followng 2 questions, i am so confuzed and have no idea how to start and what formulas to use.


1. the minimum mass of a star is 0.08 solar mass or 80 Jupiter masses. If the fuel that powered stars was helium instead of hydrogen would the minimum mass of stars be more, les or still be 0.08 sollar mass? (hint: think of the number of protons in nuclei)

2. the sun emits as much energy as 3.9 *10^24 100- Watts light-bulbs (that’s a whole lot of light bulbs!) every second. We call that number its luminosity. Give that the radius of the sun is constant in time, how much energy is produced in the Sun every second? Is it more than, less than or equal to its luminosity? Justify your answer ( no calculations necessary)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1, is a dumb question - depending on what level of course this is - are we supposed to just simply consider everything the same except the number of protons, go into the CNO cycle,conditions for direct He3 (He4) fusion or what?

2, Is this simply asking you how many J/s there are in 100W * 3.8e24 ?

Have you copied these questions down correctly or are you a victim of some stupid watered down 'modern' physics course? If so we will do our best - it's not your fault!
 
I am in an intro to astronomy course and these questions are straight from my assignment. i do not understand what any of it means so i don't even know how to go about solving them

thank you so much
 
2, A watt is one joule (energy) per second. So a 100W light bulb emits 100J/s
Work out how many Joules/s the sun emits if it has 3.9x10^24 of these light bulbs.

ps do you know what numbers like 3.9x10^24 mean?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top