Astronomy - Main sequence and red giants

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the disparity in the number of main sequence stars compared to red giants, attributing it primarily to the longer lifespan of main sequence stars, which can last billions of years. In contrast, the red giant phase is significantly shorter, lasting hundreds of millions to a billion years. Additionally, not all main sequence stars evolve into red giants; only those with initial masses between 0.5 to 10 Solar masses can undergo this transformation. The analogy of finding a four-leaf clover highlights the rarity of red giants compared to the abundance of main sequence stars. Overall, the longevity of the main sequence phase is the key reason for the observed star population differences.
tosv
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
What is the main reason why there are so many more stars in the Main sequence in comparison with the number of red giants?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'd guess that the main sequence for moderate-low mass stars takes billions of years while the red giant phase is much much shorter. On the order of hundreds of millions to a billion or so years at most I think.
 
I'd agree with Drakkith on that point, plus not all main sequence stars will ever be red giants. They have to be born with 0.5 to 10 Solar masses worth of matter, or have it added to them by a companion during their lives. Akin to finding a four leaf clover on one specific day of the year.
 
Thanks for your replies!

I think my question have been answered now.
 

Thread 'Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos'

This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
View full post »

Thread 'Asteroid 2024 YR4 has a 1% risk of a multi-megaton impact in 2032 (now ruled out)'

Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Discovering the Truth About Antares: From Young Red Supergiant to Blue Giant
Replies
5
Views
2K
B On the post-main-sequence evolution
Replies
9
Views
2K
B Which star is the closest red giant to Earth according to The Guardian?
Replies
32
Views
3K
B Star at black hole event horizon
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Expansion of a star to become a red giant
Replies
16
Views
3K
I Can Future Civilizations Use Dyson Spheres to Survive a Red Giant Sun?
Replies
20
Views
3K
B Will Big Stars Turn Into Red Supergiants or Red Giants?
Replies
5
Views
2K
I J0524-0336, surprisingly high Li concentration
Replies
2
Views
3K
B Beware of "truthiness" in astronomy in seemingly reliable websites
Replies
21
Views
2K
I What happens first -- Sun Red Giant or Andromeda collision?
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top