Astronomy; Precession data co-ordinate systems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the task of mapping precession in celestial coordinates (Right Ascension and Declination) from 1950 to 2000 using a coordinate conversion application. Users express confusion about the meaning of the homework question and seek clarification on how to obtain the necessary data for their calculations. There is a request for additional information or findings related to the topic, indicating a desire for more guidance. The conversation highlights the challenges faced by individuals in understanding astronomical coordinate systems and precession. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for clearer explanations and resources in astronomy education.
ma18
Messages
93
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Use a coordinate conversion application to roughly map out the amount of precession in coordinate
positions (R.A and Declination) in the sky between 1950 and 2000.


Homework Equations



I can easily find a converter on the internet

The Attempt at a Solution



I am a little flabbergasted at what this question means. Can anyone explain it to me?

Where would I get this data?

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not generating any responses at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us? Any new findings?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Calculate Voyager trajectory using JPL data
Replies
1
Views
2K
Who is Bill Wheaton? A Retired Astrophysicist and Pioneer in X-Ray Astronomy
Replies
2
Views
823
Simple Astronomy questions - Need
Replies
8
Views
5K
Computation for nuclear reactor systems
Replies
1
Views
3K
Astronomy: Sun azimuth from altitude, hour angle, and declination
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Building a solar system simulator
Replies
15
Views
3K
Normal tangential co-ordinates(ut,un)
Replies
1
Views
1K
Co-ordinate systems and velocities
Replies
8
Views
31K
Gradient in general co-ordinate system
Replies
1
Views
2K
Gaussian Co-ordinates-background and derivation
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top