Asymptotes curve (1-2x)/(3x+5)

  • Thread starter Thread starter JohnnyPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve
AI Thread Summary
To find the vertical asymptote of the curve (1-2x)/(3x+5), check the denominator for points where it does not exist. The horizontal asymptote can be determined by taking the limit of the function as x approaches infinity, which results in y = -2/3. A common method for finding horizontal asymptotes in rational functions is to divide both the numerator and denominator by the highest power of x and observe the behavior of the remaining terms. It is important to note that an asymptote is represented as a line, typically expressed in the form y = k. Understanding these concepts helps clarify the relationship between a function and its inverse regarding asymptotes.
JohnnyPhysics
I the curve (1-2x)/(3x+5). I have been asked to find the verticle and horizontal asymptotes. Can anyone help me with a strategy?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here are some hints.

Vertical asymptote: check the demominator, see which point doesn't exist.

horizontal asymptote: take limit of f(x) as x tends to infinity. What is the relation between the limit value you find and the horizontal asymptote?
 
Last edited:
horizontal asymptote: take limit of f(x) as x tends to infinity. What is the relation between the limit value you find and the horizontal asymptote?
I don't know but that answer looks a little too complicated...

y = (1-2x)/(3x+5)
3xy + 5y = 1 - 2x
x = (1 - 5y )/(3y + 2)

Now, find the value y can't have...

but beware, I have been wrong before (intentionally of course! )
 
Originally posted by FZ+
I don't know but that answer looks a little too complicated...

y = (1-2x)/(3x+5)
3xy + 5y = 1 - 2x
x = (1 - 5y )/(3y + 2)

Now, find the value y can't have...

but beware, I have been wrong before (intentionally of course! )

That's interesting. I never thought of it like that. That suggests to me that the horizontal asymptote of a function should be equivalent to the vertical asymptote of its inverse (if the inverse exists). Let's see. That might be too general.

Say y(x)= (Ax^n+B)/(Cx^n+D)
Then y=A/C is its horizontal asymptote.
It's inverse:
yCx^n+yD=Ax^n+B
x^n(yC-A)=B-yD
x=[(B-yD)/(yC-A)]^(1/n)
Has as its vertical asymptote y=A/C
YEAH!
(For the second graph, x is a function of y - so y=A/C is a vertical line).

Of course, the converse should also be true.
I like that. It shows how arbitrary our placement of the axes and the definition of our variables are.
My algebra skills break down from there. I tried having nonzero coefficients for other powers of x [eg. x^(n-1)] but I'm not sure I can solve for x in that case.
 
In this case the largest degrees of the variables are the same (to the first). So for horizontal asymtotes don't u just take the ratio:

-2x + 1
3x + 5

So the horizontal asymtote is (-2/3)

Right?
 
right
To find horizontal asymptotes (when dealing with rational functions of polynomials), divide both top and bottom of the fraction by the highest power of x and take the limit as x->[oo]
Essentially, all terms which have an x that is less than the highest power will tend to zero, and that is a shortcut that most people use.

For example, if the highest power of x is in the denominator, all the terms in the numerator will tend to zero and that asymptote is y=0.

btw, an asymptote is a line (or some y-value) that the graph approaches, so it should be written as y=k, rather than just k, although I'm sure anyone would know what you mean if you said the horizontal asymptote is -2/3
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top