Is the Amplitude Coefficient of Reflection Always 0 at 90 Degrees?

Thread starter alchemist7
Start date Feb 9, 2009
Tags

Amplitude Angle Angle of incidence Coefficient Incidence Parallel Reflection

AI Thread Summary

The amplitude coefficient of reflection is zero at an angle of incidence of 90 degrees, as derived from Fresnel's equations. This occurs because the reflection coefficient for parallel polarization becomes zero when the angle of incidence equals the angle of refraction. The discussion also touches on Brewster's angle, which is relevant for understanding when reflection is minimized for specific polarization states. Clarification is sought on whether the original question pertains to Brewster's angle, indicating a potential misunderstanding. Overall, the consensus is that the amplitude coefficient of reflection can indeed be zero at 90 degrees.

Feb 9, 2009

alchemist7

At what angle of incidence is amplitude coefficient of reflection parallel to the incidence plane 0?

my solution is that by Fresnell's equation, r//=tan(i-i`)/tan(i+i`)=0, i=i`,i=90.so for whatever surface,angle of incidence should be 90.

is it correct? different from the answer!

Physics news on Phys.org

Feb 9, 2009

LowlyPion

Homework Helper

Is what you're trying to find the Brewster's angle by any chance?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brewster's_angle

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

View full post »

Thread 'I've come across another fluid pressure problem I don't understand'

Neglect gravity other than that of water; neglect friction. F1=ρgsh=1000*10*1*(1+4)=50000 N; F1=ρgsh=1000*10*0.1*4=4000 N; F3=50000-4000=46000 N?

View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

View full post »