At what points is the potential zero?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the points where the electric field and potential are zero between two charges: a 2.9 µC charge at x = 0 and a -2.0 µC charge at x = 3.5 cm. The user initially struggles with the calculations, particularly in setting up the equations for the electric field and potential. A key point raised is the incorrect placement of the charges, with clarification that the 2.9 µC charge should be at x = -0.55 cm instead of x = 0. This misplacement complicates the calculations, leading to incorrect answers. The thread emphasizes the importance of accurately defining the positions of the charges in solving the problem.
Kali8972
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if someone could help get me started on this problem. I thought I knew how to solve it but keep coming up with the wrong answer:

A 2.9 µC is at x = 0 and a -2.0 µC charge is at x = 3.5 cm. (Let V = 0 at r = .)

(a) At what point along the line joining them is the electric field zero?
x = cm
(b) At what points is the potential zero?
x = cm (smaller x value)
x = cm (larger x value)


a) [(2.9e-6 C)k]/(.055+ x)^2 = [k(2e-6)]/(x^2)

k's cancel.. and then use quadratic to find it but the values aren't the right ones... What am I missing?

Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kali8972 said:
a) [(2.9e-6 C)k]/(.055+ x)^2 = [k(2e-6)]/(x^2)

Your problem is that you've got the 2.9\mu C charge sitting at x=-0.55cm, and you've got the -2\mu C charge sitting at the origin.

(edited for typos)
 
well yeah I guess that would make things a little more difficult! haha thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top