Atmospheric Pressure & Boiling Point of Water: 20 C

AI Thread Summary
To achieve a boiling point of water at 20°C, the atmospheric pressure must be significantly reduced, with calculations suggesting around 25 mbar. The Clausius-Clapeyron equation is essential for determining this relationship, requiring basic algebra to apply correctly. It's important to note that the calculation assumes pure water, as impurities like salt increase the boiling point. Initial calculations led to confusion, indicating the need for careful arithmetic. Accurate resources like steam tables can provide reliable data for these calculations.
ybhathena
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
What does the atmospheric pressure have to be to make the boiling point of water 20 C?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Google "Clausius-Clapeyron equation" and apply it...
 


Oh ok that seems to be what I need. Its a little bit advanced, could you explain the general idea of how to use this formula? I am a bit new
 


Hmm... Well that would be a very involved answer. You should be able to handle it if you know basic algebra. I'm assuming you were given the values to plug in. Also it assumes that it's pure water. Impurities such as salt require the chemical process to first break the hydrogen bonds making water boil at a higher temperature.

I did it for you quickly and got an an answer of 18,900m rounded.

Edit: Actually that can't be correct. That's the limit where water boils at the internal temperature of a human, 37 C. I must have messed up my arithmetic.
 
Last edited:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top