Atoms and Heat: How Temperature Affects Motion

ComputerPsi
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Why do atoms move faster in a higher temperature?
If an atom was initially not moving at all, and then heat was applied to it, would it start moving? If so, what direction will it move in?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not possible for an atom to not be moving at all, except at absolute zero, which is unobtainable.

Atoms move faster at higher temperatures because that is how we define temperature. Temperature is related to the average kinetic energy of particles in a substance. The higher their kinetic energy (the faster they are moving), the faster will be the measurement of the thermometer.

"Heat" and "temperature" are statistical concepts which apply to large collections of atoms simultaneously. It is not very sensible to describe a single atom as having a temperature; nor is it sensible to talk about applying heat to one single atom.

- Warren
 
OK... Thats understood, but it raises 2 questions.
1. What direction do the atoms go? Or do they just bounce off other atoms?
2. Do only the atoms move around from kinetic energy, or do individual particles like protons, nutrons, and electrons move also?
 
ComputerPsi said:
OK... Thats understood, but it raises 2 questions.
1. What direction do the atoms go? Or do they just bounce off other atoms?
2. Do only the atoms move around from kinetic energy, or do individual particles like protons, nutrons, and electrons move also?

1) The direction of the atoms are completely random according to the Kinetic Molecular Theory.

2) Only the atoms move, the protons and neutrons are fixed in the atom as being the nucleus with electrons "rotating" around the nucleus. If the atoms move fast enough, some atoms will get ionized (they will lose 1, some, or all electrons).
 
ArmoSkater87 said:
Only the atoms move, the protons and neutrons are fixed in the atom as being the nucleus with electrons "rotating" around the nucleus. If the atoms move fast enough, some atoms will get ionized (they will lose 1, some, or all electrons).

No, I mean if the particles are not in an atom.. Individually floating around. Would they move from heat, or only atoms affected by it?

Btw, thanks for the replies. It answers a couple of questions. :smile:
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top