Atoms with several electrons, potential energy

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


I don't really understand the problem wording. What do they ask me exactly? Here it goes:
Consider the potential energy V(r) of an electron in an atom whose atomic number is Z. Calculate the potential energy aproximating the distribution of charge of the others Z-1 electrons with a distribution given by the density of probability of the ground state of the hydrogen atom. Analize the behavior for the most internal electrons (r<< a_0) and for the most external ones (r>>a_0).

Homework Equations


V(r)=-\frac{ke^2Z}{r} or V(r)=\frac{ke^2Z}{r} if I consider only 2 electrons rather than proton vs electron.
P(r)dr=\frac{4}{a_0 ^3}r^2 e^{-2r/a_0}dr.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not even sure about the word distribution. I have in mind Dirac's deltas. What has it to see with P(r)dr that I gave above?
I must calculate the potential energy of the electrons that are close to the nucleous and the ones that are far from it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do I do that? I know the potential of an electron in a atom, but how to use the distribution given? I'm really confused. Can someone help me?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top