Attraction of two spheres in deep space

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational attraction between two solid lead spheres in deep space, initially stated as 540N when their centers are 20m apart. Participants express frustration over the calculations, particularly regarding the distance and the gravitational constant used. It is clarified that the gravitational force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance, and if the distance is tripled, the force would decrease significantly. After some back-and-forth, one participant successfully recalculates the force, confirming the original value of 540N is accurate with the correct application of the gravitational formula. The conversation highlights the importance of careful calculations and understanding the gravitational formula in physics problems.
Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A solid led sphere of radius 10m has a mass of about 57 million kg. If two of these spheres are floating in deep space with their centers 20m apart, the gravitational attraction between them is only 540N. How large would this gravitational force be if the distance between the centers was tripled?


Homework Equations


F=ma
W=mg
Gm1m2 / d^2



The Attempt at a Solution



This is starting to piss me off.

(G x 57,000,000^2) / 40^2 ≠ 540. It's not even close!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravitational force is, as your formula shows, inversely proportional to the square of the distance. If the distance between centers is tripled, the force is multiplied by 1/9.

(where did you get the "40" in the denominator? The given distance between centers is 20 m, not 40. And what did you use for "G".)
 
Feodalherren said:
Gm1m2 / d^2
Use ratios. Compare F1 when the distance = d1 to F2 when the distance = d2 = 3d1.
 
The distance between the spheres was given as 20 but their radius was given as 10m, which makes the distance between the centers a total of 40m. It's still not even close.

Did they pull these numbers out of their a-holes or something!?
 
Feodalherren said:
The distance between the spheres was given as 20 but their radius was given as 10m, which makes the distance between the centers a total of 40m.
You are told that their centers are 20m apart.
 
Woops, you're right. That makes the number even less plausible... Could you calculate it and see if you get 540N?
I must be doing something wrong I get a HUGE number.
 
Feodalherren said:
Woops, you're right. That makes the number even less plausible... Could you calculate it and see if you get 540N?
I must be doing something wrong I get a HUGE number.
Use ratios. If the distance doubles, for example, does the force get bigger or smaller? By what factor?

I will check their numbers out to see if that quoted force makes sense, but you do not need to do that to answer the question.
Edit: Their numbers work out just fine. For the given masses and distance, the force is about 540 N, just like they say.
 
I did use ratios and got 60N. What threw me off was their numbers. They make absolutely no sense.Why would they confuse students by just arbitrarily making up numbers when there's a very specific and easy way to get real numbers!?
 
Feodalherren said:
I did use ratios and got 60N.
Perfectly correct.
What threw me off was their numbers. They make absolutely no sense.Why would they confuse students by just arbitrarily making up numbers when there's a very specific and easy way to get real numbers!?
There's nothing wrong with their numbers. You must have made an error somewhere.
 
  • #10
Could you show me how you calculated it, please?

I'm having the same problem with a bunch of questions.
 
  • #11
Feodalherren said:
Could you show me how you calculated it, please?
You have the equation, just plug in the numbers. What did you use for G?
 
  • #12
G= 6.67 x 10^-11

So what I did was (G(57,000,000)^2) / 20^2
 
  • #13
Feodalherren said:
G= 6.67 x 10^-11
Good.
So what I did was (G(57,000,000)^2) / 20^2
Try it again. You can show your steps if you still can't get it to work.
 
  • #14
Actually this time it worked... I'm apparently not calculator savvy.

Thank you very much! Greatly appreciate the help!
 
Back
Top