Auto-correlation of a stochastic equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tyler_D
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stochastic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the auto-correlation of a stochastic equation involving Wiener integrals and Brownian motion. Participants are exploring the mathematical properties and implications of the expressions presented in the context of stochastic processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the structure of the auto-correlation expression and questioning the treatment of exponential terms. There is also inquiry into the nature of the function W(t) and its implications for the integrals involved.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants providing clarifications and corrections regarding the notation and assumptions. There is an acknowledgment of potential typos and a discussion about the independence of integrals in the context of expectation values.

Contextual Notes

Participants are addressing the specifics of the Wiener integral and its properties, including questions about periodicity and the correct limits of integration. There is an emphasis on ensuring clarity in the mathematical expressions used.

Tyler_D
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Calculate the auto-correlation of ##x(t)=e^{-\beta W(t)}W(t)##
Relevant Equations
##\langle x(t)x(t+\tau)\rangle##, ##W(t)=\int_0^t dW(s)##
Here is my attempt:

$$
\begin{align}
\langle x(t)x(t+\tau) \rangle &= \langle (e^{-\beta W(t)}W(t))(e^{-\beta W(t+\tau)}W(t+\tau))\rangle \\
&= \langle (e^{-\beta W(t)}e^{-\beta W(t+\tau)})(W(t)W(t+\tau))\rangle \\
&= \langle (e^{-\beta W(t)}e^{-\beta W(t+\tau)})(\int_0^t dW(t)\int_0^{t+\tau}dW(t))\rangle \\
&= \langle (e^{-\beta W(t)}e^{-\beta W(t+\tau)})\int_0^t dW(t)(\int_0^{t}dW(t)+\int_t^{\tau}dW(t))\rangle
\end{align}
$$

From here on I am quite lost on what to do with the exponentials. Do I Taylor-expand them, or what is the best thing to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is W(t) some special function? The Lambert W function maybe? That would make nice integrals.
 
It is the Wiener-integral/Brownian motion (my bad, should've written it in the OP):

##
W(t) = \int_0^t dW(s)
##
 
Last edited:
I don't understand something, you wrote in Eq. (4) ##\int_0^{t+\tau}dW(s) = \int_0^t dW(s)+\int_t^{\tau}dW(s)##, but obviously this means that: ##\int_0^{t+\tau}dW(s)=\int_0^\tau dW(s)##.
Does this mean that Weiner integral is periodic with period ##t##, since then ##W(t+\tau)=W(\tau)##?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tyler_D
That's also a typo, thanks for spotting it. The upper limit in the last integral should naturally be ##\tau+t##, not just ##\tau##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K