1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Automatic Control: Specifications for 3rd-order systems and higher ?

  1. Jun 28, 2008 #1
    I'm designing a lead-lag controller to control a robotics-arm (part of an excercise).
    I have found diagrams showing the correlation between overshoot and phasemargin for a second order system but in my excercise I have a third-order system. Can I apply the the relations for a 2nd-order system or can I somehow divide the problem into parts and apply the knowledge of 2nd and 1st order systems? I have the following system:
    1.9/(9*s^3+96.5s^2+40s)
    with the following specifications:
    Risetime < 1.72s
    Overshoot < 5%
    Control signal < 100
    Stationary error <5% when unit ramp is reference signal.

    I tried an approach with 2 lead-compensators in series to reduce N in
    Flead=N(s+b)/(s+bN)
    Flag=(s+a)/(s+a/M)

    If you want to see it, my matlab code follows (A Proportional controller was tried first and used as a reference). Appearantly, the expected speed-increase isn't there at all either is any of the other improvements.

    %%
    %Problem 1 %(FrCoef=b, GearFact=n in the instructions)
    J=4.5;Lm=2;Rm=21;FrCoef=1;Ktau=38;Km=0.5;GearFact=1/20;
    s=tf('s');
    G=GearFact*Ktau/(s*(s*Lm+Rm)*(J*s+FrCoef)+s*Km*Ktau);
    G

    %%
    %Problem 2, risetime, loop-gain
    Gc=feedback(G,1);
    %Identification gives:
    Q=1.9;P=9*s^3+96.5*s^2+40*s;
    rlocus(Q/P);
    %Kp=4.41 has relative damping of 1/sqrt(2) (Increasing Kp implies shorter rise-time). We end up at Kp=4.57.
    figure
    step(feedback(4.57*G,1),100);

    %%
    %Problem 3, Cross-over frequency, phasemargin och bandwidth.
    [aaa Phasemargin ccc CrossoverFrequency]=margin(4.57*G);
    Bandwidth=bandwidth(feedback(4.57*G,1),-3);

    Phasemargin %64.34°
    CrossoverFrequency %=0.1974
    Bandwidth %=0.3129

    %%
    %Problem 4
    bode(G)
    %We calculate the phase at frequency=0.7896 (4 times faster system gives cross-overfrequency at 0.7896). Phase(0.7896)= -156°.
    %5% Overshoot implies 64° phasemargin (from the infamous diagram for 2nd order systems) (från figur 5.16 sid 94 Glad &
    %Ljung). Required increase in phasemargin is 64°-(180°-156°-11.3° (We preemtively consider the cominig lag-compensator))=51.3°. Uppdelat
    %2 lead-compensators in series give 25.65°/compensator. Solving for N in
    %arctan(0.5(sqrt(N)-1/sqrt(N))
    %gives:
    y=25.65; %y=required phase-increase for simplicity
    N=1+2*tan(y)+sqrt((1+2*tan(y))^2-1);
    N
    %N=6.4812
    %b is calculated in accordance with b="desired cross-over frequency"/sqrt(N)
    b=0.7896/sqrt(N);
    b
    %We calculate K=1/(sqrt(N)*sqrt(N)*abs(G(i*"desired cross-over frequency"))
    K=1/(sqrt(N)*abs(evalfr(G,0.7896*i)));
    K
    a=0.1.*0.7896
    Flead=K*(N*((s+a)/(s+b*N)))^2;
    M=2;
    Flag=((s+a)/(s+(a/M)));
    figure
    bode(feedback(G*Flead*Flag,1));
    figure
    step((1/s)*feedback(G*Flead*Flag,1)) %We multiply the feedback function with 1/s so that matlab-function step gives the ramp-response (a ramp is an integrated step).
     
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you help with the solution or looking for help too?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Automatic Control: Specifications for 3rd-order systems and higher ?
  1. Control systems (Replies: 5)

  2. Control systems (Replies: 6)

Loading...