Average velocity of particles and maxwell distribution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The average velocity of particles in a box under constant pressure and temperature can be calculated using the Maxwell distribution. The total number of particles hitting a unit area of a wall is given by the formula 1/4 n \overline{v}, where n is the particle density and \overline{v} is the average speed. The discussion clarifies that while one might initially think only one-eighth of the particles move towards the wall, the correct approach involves integrating over spherical coordinates to find that \overline{v_z} = 1/4 \overline{v}, leading to the established formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution
  • Basic knowledge of statistical mechanics
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates in calculus
  • Concept of average velocity in three-dimensional space
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution in detail
  • Learn about the application of spherical coordinates in physics
  • Explore the concept of average velocity and its significance in kinetic theory
  • Investigate the implications of particle density on collision rates in gas dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of thermodynamics, and anyone interested in the kinetic theory of gases will benefit from this discussion.

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
Consider many same particles are moving randomly in a constant pressure and constant temperature box. The average speed [tex]\overline{v}[/tex] of the particle can be calculated by maxwell distribution. Now assume the density of particles in the box is [tex]n[/tex], so in unit time, total number of particle hitting unit area of a wall is given by

[tex]\frac{1}{4}n\overline{v}[/tex]

I am thinking this problem, actually, we are considering a small volume in front of the wall being hit. The cross area of region is unit while the length of that region is [tex]d[/tex], so in time [tex]t[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d}{t} \approx \overline{v}[/tex]

Since not all particle inside that region will hit the wall, only those moving towards the wall will do. Well if we consider each particle in that region might have velocity along x, -x, y, -y, z, -z direction. So only one-eighth of them will along the direction towards the wall, so the expression we get should be

[tex]\frac{1}{8}n\overline{v}[/tex]

but why in many book, it is 1/4 instead?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KFC said:
I am thinking this problem, actually, we are considering a small volume in front of the wall being hit. The cross area of region is unit while the length of that region is [tex]d[/tex], so in time [tex]t[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d}{t} \approx \overline{v}[/tex]

Since not all particle inside that region will hit the wall, only those moving towards the wall will do. Well if we consider each particle in that region might have velocity along x, -x, y, -y, z, -z direction. So only one-eighth of them will along the direction towards the wall, so the expression we get should be

[tex]\frac{1}{8}n\overline{v}[/tex]

but why in many book, it is 1/4 instead?

Your reasoning isn't proper. Let z be direction normal to the surface element. On average [tex](S \overline{v_z} t) n[/tex] particles hits the surface S (it's the number of particles in a cuboid with base surface S and height [tex]\overline{v_z} t[/tex]; [tex]\overline{v_z}[/tex] is average veliocity in z direction of particles moving towards considered surface element; components in other direction are unimportant because on average as much particles leave cuboid as come into through its side faces; it's not true that only one-eighth is moving towards surface). So [tex]\overline{v_z} n[/tex] particles hits unit surface element per unit time.

All we need to find now is the dependence between [tex]\overline{v_z}[/tex] and [tex]\overline{v}[/tex]. In order to do it we use spherical coordinates. Let [tex]\theta[/tex] be the angle between z axis and [tex]\vec{v}[/tex] and [tex]\phi[/tex] be the angle between the projection of [tex]\vec{v}[/tex] on xy plane and x axis. Because all direction are equally probable we have:
[tex] \overline{v_z}=\frac{\int_0^{\pi/2} \int_0^{2\pi} \overline{v} \cos\theta (\sin\theta d\theta d\phi)}<br /> {\int_0^\pi \int_0^{2\pi} \sin\theta d\theta d\phi}=<br /> \overline{v}\frac{2 \pi \int_0^{\pi/2} \sin\theta d(\sin\theta)}{4 \pi}=\frac{1}{4} \overline{v}[/tex]
In first integral we integrate [tex]\theta[/tex] form [tex]0[/tex] to [tex]\pi/2[/tex] because
we consider only particles moving towards our surface.
[tex](\sin\theta d\theta d\phi)[/tex] is an infitesimal solid angle.
 
paweld said:
Your reasoning isn't proper. Let z be direction normal to the surface element. On average [tex](S \overline{v_z} t) n[/tex] particles hits the surface S (it's the number of particles in a cuboid with base surface S and height [tex]\overline{v_z} t[/tex]; [tex]\overline{v_z}[/tex] is average veliocity in z direction of particles moving towards considered surface element; components in other direction are unimportant because on average as much particles leave cuboid as come into through its side faces; it's not true that only one-eighth is moving towards surface). So [tex]\overline{v_z} n[/tex] particles hits unit surface element per unit time.

All we need to find now is the dependence between [tex]\overline{v_z}[/tex] and [tex]\overline{v}[/tex]. In order to do it we use spherical coordinates. Let [tex]\theta[/tex] be the angle between z axis and [tex]\vec{v}[/tex] and [tex]\phi[/tex] be the angle between the projection of [tex]\vec{v}[/tex] on xy plane and x axis. Because all direction are equally probable we have:
[tex] \overline{v_z}=\frac{\int_0^{\pi/2} \int_0^{2\pi} \overline{v} \cos\theta (\sin\theta d\theta d\phi)}<br /> {\int_0^\pi \int_0^{2\pi} \sin\theta d\theta d\phi}=<br /> \overline{v}\frac{2 \pi \int_0^{\pi/2} \sin\theta d(\sin\theta)}{4 \pi}=\frac{1}{4} \overline{v}[/tex]
In first integral we integrate [tex]\theta[/tex] form [tex]0[/tex] to [tex]\pi/2[/tex] because
we consider only particles moving towards our surface.
[tex](\sin\theta d\theta d\phi)[/tex] is an infitesimal solid angle.


Thanks for your reply. I didn't see the reply until now, sorry :(

You reasoning is quite mathematics. I am not completely understand how do you get obtain the integral and why do you need to divide it by another integral?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
961