Avg and instantaneous accel question

  • Thread starter Thread starter missrikku
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a particle's motion with given initial velocity and constant acceleration. The key point is that at the maximum x-coordinate, the particle's velocity in the x-direction must be zero, indicating it has reached a turning point. Participants clarify that while the y-component of velocity may not be zero, the x-component must be to determine the maximum position accurately. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding motion dynamics rather than making assumptions about the trajectory. The conclusion is that the particle must have a speed of 0 m/s at its maximum x value to confirm it has reached that point.
missrikku
hello again,

I am having trouble with this problem:

A particle leaves the origin with an initial velocity v = (3.00i) m/s and a constant acceleration a = (-1.00i - 0.500j) m/s^2. When the particle reaches its max x coordinate, what are a)it's velocity and b) its position vector.

Am I to assume that at the max the v = 0 m/s? That means I've got to assume that the motion is a parabola, but I don't think that I have enough information to assume that. Or do I? I would just like to know how to start this problem out. Can someone lead me in the right direction? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think considering at max x, the x component of v (but not neccessarily the y!) to be zero is pretty reasonable, as you are looking for turning points.
 
If v> 0 then the particle is still moving to the right: it's not yet at it's maximum x value.

If v< 0 then is already moving to the left: it's coming back from it's maximum x value.

In either case, the particle is not AT it's maximum x value.

In order to be AT it's maximum x value, the particle's speed MUST be 0- that's not an "assumption"!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top