Axial Force in Structure with No Parallel Force

AI Thread Summary
Axial force can exist in a structural member even when no parallel force is applied, particularly when a load is applied perpendicular to the member. In the case of a simply supported beam with a vertical load, compressive forces develop on one side of the neutral axis while tensile forces emerge on the opposite side. These horizontal forces generate a moment that helps resist the perpendicular load. Therefore, the interaction of forces within the beam illustrates the presence of axial forces despite the absence of direct parallel loads. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate structural analysis and design.
erfe
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Does axial force exist in a member of a structure where no force acts parallel to the member?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
a force is applied perpendicular to the member
 
I think an example of what you're referring to would be a simply supported beam (horizontal) with a load applied perpendicular to the neutral axis (verticle). In that case, there is a compressive load on one side of the neutral axis and a tensile load on the opposite side of the neutral axis. So basically there are horizontal forces in the beam that create a moment to resist the load acting perpendicular to the beam.
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'

Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'

I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
View full post »

Thread 'Query on Isentropic relationships (such as PV^gamma = constant)'

Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
View full post »

Similar threads

Force-Deformation Equations Application
Replies
1
Views
4K
What Is the Combined Magnetic Force When Parallel Magnets Align?
Replies
3
Views
3K
What Does No Axial Thrust on Hinge B Imply in Statics?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Can Vacuum Airships Overcome Structural Challenges for Feasible Flight?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Resolving Forces and Sizing Profiles in Structural Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
What Are Principal Stress Planes and Their Relation to Shear Forces?
Replies
3
Views
2K
"Members of a frame are axially inextensible" implication?
Replies
5
Views
5K
How to obtain Axial Load Capacity from Tapered Roller Bearings Catalog
Replies
4
Views
2K
A Fatigue Failure in Structural Elements: Axial, Shear & Torsional Loads
Replies
5
Views
2K
Understanding Axial Loading On a Member
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top