Axis of rotation, plane of reflection

JamesGoh
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
For a 3x3 orthogonal matrix with determinant= -1 (which means rotation followed by simple reflection), is the axis of rotation the same as the plane of reflection ?

My reasoning is follows (see attachment)

Say you have two vectors with the same angle size (which i call A), same x-values, but one of the z-values (height in this case), is the negative of the other (n.b. y-value is zero in both vectors )

Vector 1 rotates around the x-axis by 2A to get to the same spot as vector 2. Because the angle size is the same and because the z-component of vector 2 is the negative of the z-component of vector 1, we get a reflection ?

Since the "reflection" happens about the x-axis, this is why the plane of reflection is the same as the axis of rotation in the case of a 3x3 orthogonal matrix having determinant 1 ?
 

Attachments

  • examplepicture.jpg
    examplepicture.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 538
Physics news on Phys.org
if A\in \textrm{O}(3,\mathbb{R}) and \det(A)=-1, there exists a U\in \textrm{SU}(3) such that

<br /> UAU^{\dagger} = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}<br /> -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; e^{i\theta} &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; e^{-i\theta} \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

with some \theta\in\mathbb{R}.

Then there exists a V\in \textrm{SU}(2) such that

<br /> V\left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> e^{i\theta} &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; e^{-i\theta} \\<br /> \end{array}\right)V^{\dagger}<br /> = \left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> \cos(\theta) &amp; -\sin(\theta) \\<br /> \sin(\theta) &amp; \cos(\theta) \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

So if you define

<br /> W = \left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; V \\<br /> \end{array}\right)U<br />

then WAW^{\dagger} will be of such form that reflection and rotation are clearly carried out with respect to the same axis. Only problem is that W doesn't necessarily have only real entries. How to prove that W is necessarily proportional to a real matrix?
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top