Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff (CBH) Formula question

  • Thread starter Thread starter BlackHole213
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Physics news on Phys.org
BlackHole213 said:
I've been trying to understand the explicit CBH formula

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baker–...er.E2.80.93Campbell.E2.80.93Hausdorff_formula

However, I don't really understand how to know what the values of r_i and s_i are, where 1\leq i\leq n.
Like it says,

Where sn and rn are non-negative integers.
The sum runs over all possible values of sn and rn, where sn + rn > 0. They apparently stand for the number of X's and Y's in the multiple commutator. (Glad I don't have to prove this! :wink:)
 
I agree, proving it would be awful, to say to least.

This may be a dumb question, but how do I know what the possible values of r_n and s_n are? I feel like I'm over-thinking this.

For example, if I consider [X,Y], then r_n=s_n=r_1=s_1=1. If I just had the BCH formula as written by Dynkin, how would I know that r_1=s_1=1 for n=1?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top