Balancing equation for creation of Potassium benzoate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on balancing the chemical equation for the preparation of potassium benzoate from benzyl alcohol and potassium permanganate in the presence of aqueous KOH. The participant is struggling to balance the equation, specifically in incorporating KOH into the reaction. It is suggested that KOH contributes hydroxide ions (OH-) and water, which are essential for balancing hydrogen and oxygen. Additionally, the concept of balancing through half-reactions is introduced as a potential method to simplify the process. Understanding these aspects is crucial for achieving a balanced equation.
cp-svalbard
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Potassium benzoate C6H5CO2K can be prepared from benzyl alcohol, C6H5CH2OH, and potassium permanganate KMnO4 in aqueous KOH. The manganese is converted to MnO2

The Attempt at a Solution



So, my attempt to balance has left me scratching my head

C6H5CH2OH + KMnO4 \rightarrow C6H5CO2K +MnO2

Question: Since it states aqueous KOH, where does that apply in balancing out this?

What would the equation be balanced?

Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KOH means you need to use OH- and water when balancing hydrogen and oxygen.

Do you know how to balance by half reactions? Can you split the system into reduction and oxidation half reactions?

--
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top