Balancing Review and New Material: Tips for Retaining Knowledge

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yumrey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Knowledge
AI Thread Summary
For many students, retaining course material after exams can be challenging, leading to a common concern about forgetting concepts quickly. It is noted that while complete forgetfulness is rare, many find that with brief reviews, they can recall essential information. Establishing a routine for reviewing old materials can be beneficial, particularly if struggling with advanced courses that build on foundational knowledge. The discussion emphasizes that the goal of education is to grasp general concepts rather than to prepare for exams continuously. Regular practice and problem-solving from previous courses can enhance retention and understanding, especially when facing related subjects in the future. Balancing review with new coursework is crucial, and the amount of time spent on review can vary based on individual schedules and needs.
Yumrey
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Hello, I realized that I tend to forget the course material I've learned quickly after the final exam, so I think it may be a good idea to review those material even when I've done the course. Does this happen often to you? How do you deal with it while taking new courses and having other materials to study for? It seems very difficult for me to balance them. If you just review them as if you're still taking the course, how much time do you usually spend on it?
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yumrey said:
Hello, I realized that I tend to forget the course material I've learned quickly after the final exam, so I think it may be a good idea to review those material even when I've done the course. Does this happen often to you? How do you deal with it while taking new courses and having other materials to study for? It seems very difficult for me to balance them. If you just review them as if you're still taking the course, how much time do you usually spend on it?
Thank you.

Do you completely forget concepts? Or is it more akin to, "If I review it for a few minutes I'll remember what to do."

There are plenty of things I've forgotten, but if I saw it again or referenced material on the subject I would quickly remember the material. I would say that's completely normal. If it's affecting your ability to advance in courses then you might need to revisit your studying habits during courses.
 
Student100 said:
Do you completely forget concepts? Or is it more akin to, "If I review it for a few minutes I'll remember what to do."

There are plenty of things I've forgotten, but if I saw it again or referenced material on the subject I would quickly remember the material. I would say that's completely normal. If it's affecting your ability to advance in courses then you might need to revisit your studying habits during courses.

Well, it's not like I completely forget concepts, it's just that if I'm told to write a test on that course right now, I won't do well on it. I'm just wondering if it's a common practice to make reviewing old materials a routine.
 
It's really up to you and your schedule. If it isn't affecting your taking of more advanced courses then I would only really recommend comprehensive study before taking something like the physics GRE. If you begin struggling in other courses that depend on that material as a foundation, then doing problems from old material might be beneficial to you, and something you could try to squeeze in everyday.
 
  • Like
Likes Yumrey
The point of taking a course isn't to prepare you to take an exam for that course every single day. It's to teach you general concepts.

For instance, if you see a differential equation, it's perfectly okay that you aren't able to solve it. However, you should be able to say "oh, I remember a method for solving that type of equation, I think it's called the method of integrating factors..."
 
  • Like
Likes Yumrey
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
60
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top