Ball Collision: Finding Time and Location of Collision | No Air Resistance

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics2004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Collision
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the time and location of collision between two balls, B1 and B2, under the assumption of no air resistance. B1 is launched toward B2, which is falling from a height with zero initial velocity. The key to solving the problem is to first establish when B2 hits the ground and then determine the conditions for B1 to collide with B2 in the air. The participants emphasize that both balls must occupy the same position at the same time for a collision to occur. The conversation hints at a deeper connection to concepts in physics, such as the general theory of relativity, which may be explored later.
physics2004
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ball 1 (B1) and Ball 2 (B2) are located at (x,y)=(0,0) and (x,y)=(d,h).
At t=0, B1 is sent towards the initial location of B2 with a speed vi. At the same
instant that B1 is launched, B2 falls towards the ground with zero initial velocity.
Assume there is no air resistance.


picture attached

Homework Equations


1. When and where do B1 and B2 collide?


The Attempt at a Solution



none can't start...
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    4.6 KB · Views: 406
Physics news on Phys.org
You will want to figure out the when part before the where part. When does B2 hit the ground? What is the condition for B1 to hit B2 then?
 
im pretty sure the question is asking when will they hit in the air not after b2 lands
 
Last edited:
- There is no ground level given (the natural assumption that h=0 was ground level is arbitrary). Don't worry about that for now, you can rethink the case h<0 later.
- The condition for the two balls to meet is having the same position at the same time (for arbitrarily small balls, at least).

As a sidenote unrelated to the question but possibly interesting: The problem is a nice example of one of the ideas that led to the general theory of relativity; I might comment on that later if you're interested (after the problem at hand is solved).
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top