Ball Doing a Loop Min Kin Energy: Find Angle θ

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angle θ at which a ball loses contact with the wall of a hollow cylinder when its kinetic energy is 10% less than the minimum required to complete a full loop. The minimum kinetic energy needed is established as E_k_min = (27/10)mgR. The user attempts to find the speed v(α) at a given angle α and equate the vertical component of centripetal acceleration with gravitational acceleration, leading to an inequality involving cos(α). Participants emphasize the importance of considering both gravitational and normal forces at the point of contact loss, clarifying that the normal force becomes zero when the ball is about to lose contact. The conversation highlights the need to accurately account for all forces acting on the ball to solve the problem correctly.
Cepterus
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A ball with radius ##r## is inside a hollow cylinder with radius ##r+R##.
mk7hulja.png


In the first part of the assignment, one has to calculate the minimum kinetic energy the ball has to have at the bottom in order to complete a full loop in the cylinder. It turns out to be ##E_{\text{kin, min}}=\frac{27}{10}mgR##.

Now we suppose the kinetic energy of the ball is 10% less than needed to do the loop. We want to compute the angle ##\theta## at which the ball will lose contact to the wall of the cylinder, using the angle ##\alpha = \pi-\theta##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


My idea was to calculate the speed ##v(\alpha)## the ball has for a given angle ##\alpha##. Then I would calculate the vertical component of the centripetal acceleration and equate it with the gravitational acceleration:
\begin{align*}
E_{\text{tot}}& = E_{\text{kin}}+E_{\text{rot}}+E_{\text{pot}} \\
& = \frac12mv(\alpha)^2+\frac12 I\omega(\alpha)^2+mgh\\
&=\frac12mv(\alpha)^2+\frac12 I\left(\frac{v(\alpha)}{r}\right)^2+mg(R+R\cos\alpha)\\
&=\frac12mv(\alpha)^2+\frac12 \cdot\frac25mr^2\left(\frac{v(\alpha)}{r}\right)^2+mgR(1+\cos\alpha)\\
&=\frac12mv(\alpha)^2\left(1+\frac25\right)+mgR(1+\cos\alpha)\\
&=\frac7{10}mv(\alpha)^2+mgR(1+\cos\alpha).
\end{align*}
Now use ##E_{\text{tot}}=0.9\cdot\frac{27}{10}mgR=\frac{243}{100}mgR##:
\begin{align*}
\frac{243}{100}mgR& = \frac7{10}mv(\alpha)^2+mgR(1+\cos\alpha)\\
\frac7{10}v(\alpha)^2&=gR(\frac{243}{100}-1-\cos\alpha)\\
v(\alpha)^2&=\frac{10}7gR(\frac{143}{100}-\cos\alpha)
\end{align*}
Now the vertical component of the centripetal acceleration would be ##\cos\alpha\cdot\frac{v(\alpha)^2}R## and has to be smaller than ##g##, which gives us
\begin{align*}
\frac{\cos\alpha}{R}\cdot\frac{10}7gR(\frac{143}{100}-\cos\alpha)&<g\\
\cos\alpha\cdot\frac{10}7(\frac{143}{100}-\cos\alpha)&<1\\
\frac{143}{100}-\cos\alpha&<\frac{7}{10\cos\alpha}
\end{align*}
so in the end we get the inequality ##\cos\alpha+\frac{7}{10\cos\alpha}>\frac{143}{100}##. If I regard this as an equality to find the minimum angle, however, the equality does not have any solutions. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cepterus said:
the vertical component of the centripetal acceleration would be ##\cos\alpha\cdot\frac{v(\alpha)^2}R## and has to be smaller than g
That doesn't work. Tangential acceleration also has a vertical component.
What do you know about the forces when it loses contact?
 
haruspex said:
What do you know about the forces when it loses contact?
There is the gravitational force ##mg## which pulls the ball down, and the centripetal force which pushes it up and to the right. I just thought that the component to the right should be irrelevant and I should only focus on the vertical components.
haruspex said:
Tangential acceleration also has a vertical component.
What do you mean by that? Doesn't centripetal acceleration only have a radial component towards the center of the of the circle?
 
Cepterus said:
the centripetal force which pushes it up and to the right. I
Centripetal force is not an applied force. It is that component of the resultant of the applied forces that is normal to the velocity. There only two applied forces here, the normal force and gravity.
Cepterus said:
What do you mean by that? Doesn't centripetal acceleration only have a radial component towards the center of the of the circle?
I wrote tangential acceleration, not centripetal.

So, again, what do you know about the forces at the point of loss of contact?
 
In that case, we have the gravitational force and the normal force with its two components down and to the left.
 
Cepterus said:
In that case, we have the gravitational force and the normal force with its two components down and to the left.
At the point where the ball is just about to drop free of the wall, what is the magnitude of the normal force?
 
jbriggs444 said:
At the point where the ball is just about to drop free of the wall, what is the magnitude of the normal force?
As far as I know, the normal force has the same magnitude as the force which the ball applies onto the wall. At the point of loss of contact, the latter force has magnitude zero, which should therefore also be the magnitude of the normal force.
 
Cepterus said:
As far as I know, the normal force has the same magnitude as the force which the ball applies onto the wall. At the point of loss of contact, the latter force has magnitude zero, which should therefore also be the magnitude of the normal force.
Right. So what ΣF=ma equation(s) can you write? Bear in mind there may be tangential acceleration.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 139 ·
5
Replies
139
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
8K