The discussion centers around the merits of a specific book, with a focus on its logic and rigor as key attributes that make it preferable. Participants suggest that to receive more targeted and useful responses, the original poster should clarify their expectations and specific interests regarding the book. This would help streamline the conversation and prevent information from being dispersed across multiple topics.
#1
Goldbeetle
210
1
Dear all,
what's so good about this book that makes it preferable?
Thanks.
Goldbeetle
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first.
Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it.
I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...