I Bands in strongly correlated materials

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter dRic2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Materials
dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
The concepts of bands is a useful tool in describing electrons in solids, but as far as I understand it arises naturally only when the real interacting system of electrons can be mapped with a very good approximation to an independent-particles problem (a mean-field approximation). If I have strongly correlated material the correlation length is very big and standard mean-field methods begin to fail. In such a particular case do scientists keep talking about bands ?

Thanks
Ric
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes they do keep talking about bands. Consider the system everybody is talking about nowadays: Twisted Bilayer Graphene. This is a material with a flat band structure and the cause of this is electronic correlation.

People that do theory consider correlation in the hamiltonian and then get a band structure. So yes, they do keep talking about bands.
 
  • Informative
Likes dRic2
I can not agree with david. The cause of a flat band structure is not the electronic correlation. In fact, it is the atomic structure of the material that generates flat bands, if one uses the band theory to solve it. After getting the flat bands, we immediately know that the band theory is not reliable, because the "flatness" invites correlation effect into play.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes radium and dRic2
@peterwang I think I share your point of view but I was talking about mean fields approximation (like DFT), so a bit of correlation is built inside the effective potential that you use to solve the problem self-consistently. In this way you get a 1-particle equations and thus a band structure, but you are still "seeing" electron correlation (at least to some degree). The problem is when the correlation is too big (in space) and a mean field approach is not very helpful.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top