Banked circular track with friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a banked circular track problem involving a motorcyclist. The cyclist can ride without slipping at speeds below 40 km/h due to the banked angle and friction, which is calculated using force components. The calculations indicate that at the ideal speed, friction is not needed to prevent slipping, while at lower speeds, it helps counteract the downward slide. However, confusion arises regarding the conditions for slipping at various speeds, particularly when calculating the minimum speed. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly analyzing forces and drawing free-body diagrams to understand the dynamics involved.
shutdo
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, I'm new to this forum and I'm having some problem with the question below.

Homework Statement



A circular track is banked so that a motor cyclist who travels at 40 km/h in a
horizontal circle of radius 100 m experiences no tendency to side-slip. If the
coefficient of friction is 0.25 and the size of the cycle and cyclist can be ignored,

(a) show that the cyclist can ride on the track without slipping at all speeds
below 40 km/h, and

(b) find the greatest speed at which he can ride without slipping.

<br /> r=100~m\\<br /> \mu=0.25\\<br /> \text{ideal speed} ~~v=\frac{100}{9}~ ms^{-1}

2. The attempt at a solution

Part A

As there's no tendency to side-slip at 40 km/h, I assume there is
no friction acting on the body. Then, I can find the banked angle \theta
N\sin\theta = \frac{mv^2}{r}\\<br /> N\cos \theta=mg\\<br /> \theta=\arctan(\frac{10}{81})​
So to show that there is no slip at all speeds below 40 km/h,
Is it correct to just consider the force components like this?

mg\cos\theta=N
Consider the component parallel to the inclined plane
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> &amp;~~~~~~μN - mg\sin\theta\\<br /> &amp;=μmg\cos\theta -mg\sin\theta\\<br /> &amp;=0.25×mg\cos\{\arctan(\frac{10}{81})\}-mg\sin\{\arctan(\frac{10}{81})\}\\<br /> &amp;≈0.126mg&gt;0<br /> \end{align}<br />
therefore it will not slip? Is this the correct way to show the statement?

Also, if I want to calculate the minimum speed for not sliding down.
I would consider the x-component and the y-components, then I have:
x-components
<br /> \frac{mv^2}{r}=N\sin\theta-\mu N\cos\theta
y-component
<br /> N\cos\theta+\mu N\sin\theta=mg
By solving, I have
<br /> v^2=\frac{rg(\sin\theta-\mu\cos\theta)}{\cos\theta+\mu\sin\theta}
And this is the weird part, if I substitute the value of \theta I got,
v^2&lt;0...Why is that?
Can someone please point out my mistakes?

Part B

By Resolving the forces. I have
<br /> v^2=\frac{rg(\mu\cos\theta+\sin\theta)}{\cos\theta-\mu\sin\theta}\\<br /> v≈19.6~ms^{-1}=70.7~km/h
I think I have no problem with part B. Please help me with part A, thanks guys!
 

Attachments

  • case 1.jpg
    case 1.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 563
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As there's no tendency to side-slip at 40 km/h, I assume there is
no friction acting on the body.
OR - maybe the friction is big enough to balance the force that would otherwise make the body slide?

Did you draw a free-body diagram?
 
Simon Bridge said:
OR - maybe the friction is big enough to balance the force that would otherwise make the body slide?

Did you draw a free-body diagram?

Hi Simon, Thanks for the reply and thanks for the advice. I've uploaded the free body diagram.

I have considered the case.Then, from the above result.
v^2=\frac{rg(\sin\theta-\mu\cos\theta)}{\cos\theta+\mu\sin\theta}
By solving,
<br /> \theta=\arctan\frac{121}{314}≈21.07^\circ\\<br /> (\text{take}~~g=10)
and if I put this value into this, I get
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> &amp;~~~~~~μN - mg\sin\theta\\<br /> &amp;=μmg\cos\theta -mg\sin\theta\\<br /> &amp;=0.25×mg\cos\{\arctan(\frac{121}{314})\}-mg\sin\{\arctan(\frac{121}{314})\}\\<br /> &amp;≈-0.126mg&lt;0<br /> \end{align}<br />
That means the magnitude of friction is less than the component of the weight (mg)
So it will slide?? I'm confused...

I think in order to not side-slip,
\begin{align}<br /> \mu N&amp;\geq mg\sin\theta\\<br /> \mu mg\cos\theta&amp;\geq mg\sin\theta\\<br /> \tan\theta&amp;\leq\mu\\<br /> \theta&amp;\leq14.04^\circ<br /> \end {align}
 
Last edited:
You need to revisit your free-body diagram.
Don't forget that the centripetal force points towards the center of the turn ... in this case: horizontally. All the forces have to add up to this one ... solve for the angle. Careful about the direction friction points - what is the motion it opposes?

12n.GIF


Notice the fbd there - if there were no friction, you'd have to go slower around the same bend.
If you tried to go too fast, you'd slide to the outside of the bend ... so the friction must oppose this and, so, point down the slope.
(note: the pic is also a link.)
 
At ideal speed, there's no need for friction to stop the car from sliding, right?
so if the speed is less than the ideal speed, the car would slide down and the friction would counter the motion which is pointing up.

On the other hand, if the speed is higher than the ideal speed, friction would point downwards instead, which is the case in the picture you provided.

If I have not mistaken, the turning force (centripetal force) is only caused by the Normal force and friction if there is any.
 
I just have a couple of observations:
gravity, ##-mg\hat{k}##, does not have a horizontal/radial component and so has no direct contribution to make to the centripetal force.

##\vec{F}_N - mg\hat{k}## (careful: that's a vector equation) may provide a horizontal component to the right in the diagram though.

The question wants the maximum speed - you are correct that there will also be a minimum speed to go around the corner without slipping. You'll also see that if you go too fast, you'll exceed the friction force and skid: that's what skidding is. Extending this should tell you why turning into the skid and declutching will get you back under control but breaking could make matters worse ;)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top